2018
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-01644-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear auditory models yield new insights into representations of vowels

Abstract: Studies of vowel systems regularly appeal to the need to understand how the auditory system encodes and processes the information in the acoustic signal. The goal of this study is to present computational models to address this need, and to use the models to illustrate responses to vowels at two levels of the auditory pathway. Many of the models previously used to study auditory representations of speech are based on linear filter banks simulating the tuning of the inner ear. These models do not incorporate ke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is indeed consistent with demonstrations of nonlinear processing in the auditory periphery. 57 Given that both DNN and feature encoding models have roughly similar amounts of predictors (on the order of 100), this suggests that DNNs are learning nonlinear representations that are critical for extracting relevant phonetic features. 2) The dynamic temporal integration of contextual information in the DNN models: this is particularly critical for higher-order speech responses in the non-primary auditory cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is indeed consistent with demonstrations of nonlinear processing in the auditory periphery. 57 Given that both DNN and feature encoding models have roughly similar amounts of predictors (on the order of 100), this suggests that DNNs are learning nonlinear representations that are critical for extracting relevant phonetic features. 2) The dynamic temporal integration of contextual information in the DNN models: this is particularly critical for higher-order speech responses in the non-primary auditory cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inattention to auditory representation is linked to the lack of realistic models of the neural responses to speech in the auditory pathways. Realistic neural models have been developed to model the coding of speech in the midbrain (Carney, 2018; Carney and McDonough, 2019; Nelson and Carney, 2004; Zilany et al, 2014; Zilany et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AN model provided the input for both types of IC model in the form of time-varying rate, convolved with functions representing excitatory or inhibitory postsynaptic responses, which differed for the two cell types (Carney et al, 2015). The postsynaptic potential time constants and delays were set to produce BE responses with a BMF of 100 Hz (Carney and McDonough, 2019). This BMF is near the center of the distribution of IC BMFs (Kim et al, 2020; Krishna and Semple, 2000; Nelson and Carney, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct comparison between the linearly ramping shape used in this study and the exponentially ramped shape used in Yip et al is therefore not straightforward due to different stimulation parameters tested. However, one explanation for the larger effect observed by Yip et al could be that an exponentially ramped shape is simply more charge-efficient than the linearly ramping shapes used with rampUp and rampDown, possibly because the auditory system, and biology in general, operate on non-linear scales (Carney & McDonough, 2019). Another possible explanation is related to the notion that the neural membrane is a “leaky integrator,” which means that more charge is needed to compensate membrane leakage with longer than shorter pulse durations in order to excite a neural response (Parkins & Colombo, 1987; Shepherd & Javel, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%