2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0748-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis by genome-wide haplotyping of cell-free plasma DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, some of the positive cases turned out to be false positive. Although our [25][26][27], several reasons contribute to having false-positive results, including maternal chromosomal abnormality [28,29], confined placental mosaicism [30,31], vanishing twin [32], maternal copy number variations [33], fetal fraction [34], and so on. In addition, a short-term telephone followup to ascertain whether the newborns are normal or not is not entirely reliable and can also contribute to false-positive results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, some of the positive cases turned out to be false positive. Although our [25][26][27], several reasons contribute to having false-positive results, including maternal chromosomal abnormality [28,29], confined placental mosaicism [30,31], vanishing twin [32], maternal copy number variations [33], fetal fraction [34], and so on. In addition, a short-term telephone followup to ascertain whether the newborns are normal or not is not entirely reliable and can also contribute to false-positive results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, disease-specific or patient-specific assays need to be customized and tested with decent number of patient samples before clinic practise. 10,38 The field is crying for a novel general method for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of all dominant and recessive monogenic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cffDNA‐based NIPT for single‐gene diseases could still be challenging for maternally inherited disease due to low cffDNA concentration, DNA fragmentation in maternal plasma and complex inferential statistical analysis. Additionally, disease‐specific or patient‐specific assays need to be customized and tested with decent number of patient samples before clinic practise 10,38 . The field is crying for a novel general method for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of all dominant and recessive monogenic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof-of-principle studies have demonstrated that micro-fluidics-based linked-read sequence technology can be used to deduce parental haplotypes directly without the need for reference samples [18,19], although the cost analysis for this currently makes it prohibitive for routine clinical use. An alternative is the use of grandparental samples for haplotype phasing [20,21]. While complexity and costs could prohibit this being developed for autosomal recessive conditions, it is more suitable for dominant disorders such as Rb, where only one set of grandparents would be required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%