Purpose:To compare noninvasive transstenotic pressure gradient (TSPG) measurements derived from high -spatial-and temporal-resolution four-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) fl ow measurements with invasive measurements obtained from endovascular pressure wires with digital subtraction angiographic guidance.
Materials and Methods:After Animal Care and Use Committee approval, bilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS) was created surgically in 12 swine. Respiratory-gated phase-contrast vastly undersampled isotropic projection (VIPR) MR angiography of the renal arteries was performed with a 1.5-T clinical MR system (repetition time, 11.4 msec; echo time [fi rst echo], 3.7 msec; 18 000 projection angles; imaging volume, 260 3 260 3 200 mm; acquired isotropic spatial resolution, 1.0 3 1.0 3 1.0 mm; velocity encoding , 150 cm/sec). Velocities measured with phase-contrast VIPR were used to calculate TSPGs by using Navier-Stokes equations. These were compared with endovascular pressure measurements (mean and peak) performed by using fl uoroscopic guidance with regression analysis.
Results:In 19 renal arteries with an average stenosis of 62% (range, 0%-87%), there was excellent correlation between the noninvasive TSPG measurement with phase-contrast VIPR and invasive TSPG measurement for mean TSPG ( R 2 = 95 .4%) and strong correlation between noninvasive TSPG and invasive TSPG for the peak TSPG measures ( R 2 = 82.6%). The phase-contrast VIPR-derived TSPG measures were slightly lower than the endovascular measurements. In four arteries with severe stenoses and one occlusion (mean, 86%; range, 75%-100%), the residual lumen within the stenosis was too small to determine TSPG with phasecontrast VIPR.
Conclusion:The unenhanced MR angiographic technique with phasecontrast VIPR allows for accurate noninvasive assessment of hemodynamic signifi cance in a porcine model of RAS with highly accurate TSPG measurements.