1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70189-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive determination of endothelium-mediated vasodilation as a screening test for coronary artery disease: Pilot study to assess the predictive value in comparison with angina pectoris, exercise electrocardiography, and myocardial perfusion imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
97
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
97
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These analysis reported that %FMD was a sensitive and specific (71.3% and 81% respectively) screening test to predict the presence of coronary artery disease. 9 Moreover, our results showed that FMD measurements can be made with high accuracy and precision (Lin's correlation coefficient of 0.88), and very low bias (mean inter-observer difference of −0.30%). 8 These results clearly show that no invasive evaluation of endothelial vasodilator function may serve as an index integrating the overall stress imposed by CVD risk factors and reinforce the suggestion that endothelial dysfunction is an early marker of CVD that precedes clinical manifestations.…”
Section: Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These analysis reported that %FMD was a sensitive and specific (71.3% and 81% respectively) screening test to predict the presence of coronary artery disease. 9 Moreover, our results showed that FMD measurements can be made with high accuracy and precision (Lin's correlation coefficient of 0.88), and very low bias (mean inter-observer difference of −0.30%). 8 These results clearly show that no invasive evaluation of endothelial vasodilator function may serve as an index integrating the overall stress imposed by CVD risk factors and reinforce the suggestion that endothelial dysfunction is an early marker of CVD that precedes clinical manifestations.…”
Section: Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 54%
“…8,10 An important body of evidence suggests that endothelial dysfunction is a generalised process that is not necessarily confined to vessels with overt atherosclerotic alterations. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] This proposal is strengthened by the high correlation (Ͼ0.75) reported between the coronary vasomotor response and the peripheral endothelial function of the brachial artery evaluated by FMD. 11,12 Recently, three different groups 10,13,14 have demonstrated that the diagnostic of endothelial dysfunction realised in coronary and peripheral arteries in patients with different stages of coronary artery disease is related with an increased incidence of an adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease.…”
Section: Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,16,22,58 It is widely used in clinical research trials and predicts coronary artery disease, 45 postoperative cardiac events 46 and long-term cardiovascular events. 29,39,[51][52][53] Attention to detail is essential to ensure accurate and reproducible measurements using highfrequency ultrasound; a summary of the technique is presented.…”
Section: High-frequency Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A FMD of ≤ 4.5% from the baseline has been suggested as the cutoff value for identifying endothelial dysfunction (11) but such a level has not been established for the pregnant population.…”
Section: Flow-mediated Vasodilatation (Fmd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in recent years. A number of epidemiological studies have shown a link between endothelial dysfunction with later development of cardiovascular events (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%