2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2020.3016435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Conductivity and Temperature Sensing Using Magnetic Induction Spectroscopy Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eddies must then pass through the central volume of wide objects. Therefore, the eddy current density here was higher on average throughout the object compared with typical MIT excitation by circular coils [3][4][5][6][7][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Improved central area sensitivity (>20 dB) was the result of this spatial prefiltering [8].…”
Section: Electro-mechanical Mit Scanner Setupmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eddies must then pass through the central volume of wide objects. Therefore, the eddy current density here was higher on average throughout the object compared with typical MIT excitation by circular coils [3][4][5][6][7][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Improved central area sensitivity (>20 dB) was the result of this spatial prefiltering [8].…”
Section: Electro-mechanical Mit Scanner Setupmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For this reason, the practical implementation of 3D MIT has been considered here for the first time, to detect and localize perturbations throughout the depth of a weakly conductive ("biomedical") test body. With the exciter and receiver geometries previously used [3][4][5][6][7][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], the sensitivity in the central areas of a weakly conductive body is critically low [3][4][5][6][7]. In addition to the attenuation and blurring of the induction field over distance, there is another effect that further reduces the sensitivity at the center of the body: the induced eddy currents run in closed loops within the body, and the current density thus tends to be strongest near the surface, but decreases toward the center region (and along the axis of the coils), where it vanishes and no longer provides any information [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement system has a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between 60-90 dB, where measurement at low-frequency opposite-coil has the lowest SNR; and high-frequency adjacent-coil has the highest SNR. The detailed configuration was described in [26]. For the following work (see Fig.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods Using Mutual Induction Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement system has signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) between 60-90 dB, where measurement at low-frequency opposite-coil has the lowest SNR; and highfrequency adjacent-coil has the highest SNR. The detailed configuration was described in [24]. For the following work (see Fig.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods Using Mutual Induction Datamentioning
confidence: 99%