2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.98.217402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondipole Optical Scattering from Liquids and Nanoparticles

Abstract: Nondipolar contribution to optical scattering in liquids and nanoparticle suspensions has been discerned for the first time from the dominant electric dipole scattering by assigning the observed polarization and azimuthal angular distribution of scattered polarized light to pure magnetic dipole and/or electric quadrupole radiation and ruling out other (the impurity of laser polarization, multiple scattering, optical activity, and optical anisotropy) explanations. The observed scattering has potential use in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimentally, we have demonstrated that observed magnetic scattering is purely dipolar, is nonlinear in origin, and is comparable to ED scattering only at elevated (but nonrelativistic) intensities in bound electron systems by virtue of resonant enhancement. All the results of this paper (experimental and theoretical) are consistent with the dipole approximation ͑a / 1͒, in contradistinction to [16]. Our model explains the unprecedented intensity of MD emission as the result of parametrically enhanced magnetic forces acting on bound electrons, exceeding the standard limit of magnetic response expressed by Eq.…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Experimentally, we have demonstrated that observed magnetic scattering is purely dipolar, is nonlinear in origin, and is comparable to ED scattering only at elevated (but nonrelativistic) intensities in bound electron systems by virtue of resonant enhancement. All the results of this paper (experimental and theoretical) are consistent with the dipole approximation ͑a / 1͒, in contradistinction to [16]. Our model explains the unprecedented intensity of MD emission as the result of parametrically enhanced magnetic forces acting on bound electrons, exceeding the standard limit of magnetic response expressed by Eq.…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…They are fitted for each wavelength to oscillating functions B ⊥ + A ⊥ cos 2 ϕ and B + A sin 2 ϕ, respectively. The common background B ⊥ ∼ = B is less than 4% of the amplitude of the ED mode, hence confirming the isotropic response of the MNCs [23].…”
Section: -2supporting
confidence: 62%
“…S i coefficients do not depend on ϕ and the nondiagonal terms S 3 and S 4 vanish. Moreover, at a scattering angle θ = 90 • , the scattering amplitude S 1 contains the radiation of the electric dipole only, whereas S 2 cumulates the radiations of the magnetic dipole and the electric quadrupole [23].…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the amplitude scattering matrix formalism for the analysis of the scattering data [30]:  and n  constructed from the Legendre polynomials are alternately odd and even functions of cos so that for  = 90°, each scattering coefficient n a and n b appears either in S 1 or S 2 but never in both. As shown in section II, the scattering amplitude S 1 reduces to the radiation of the electric dipole ED (a 1 ) only whereas S 2 cumulates the radiations of the magnetic dipole MD (b 1 ) and the electric quadrupole EQ (a 2 ) [31,18,20].…”
Section: -Optical Studies: Static Light Scattering (Sls)mentioning
confidence: 99%