2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21248256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Determination of Strength of Concrete Incorporating Industrial Wastes as Partial Replacement for Fine Aggregate

Abstract: Schmidt rebound hammer test was employed in this study as a nondestructive test. This test method has been universally utilized due to its non-destructiveness for quick and easy assessment of material strength properties and quality of concrete of an existing structure. Industrial waste materials (air-dried alum sludge, treated alum sludge, limestone dust and quarry dust) were employed as replacement material for fine aggregates in this study. A normal strength concrete was designed to achieve 35 MPa at 28 day… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the evaluation of measurement uncertainty during estimation of compressive strength using rebound hammer both type A and type B components of uncertainty are considered as per the GUM approach. These uncertainty components consist of parameters like repeatability, calibration, moisture content and bias (15,16) . https://www.indjst.org/…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the evaluation of measurement uncertainty during estimation of compressive strength using rebound hammer both type A and type B components of uncertainty are considered as per the GUM approach. These uncertainty components consist of parameters like repeatability, calibration, moisture content and bias (15,16) . https://www.indjst.org/…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual standard uncertainties of repeatability, calibration, moisture content and bias determined by Type A and Type B assessments needs to be combined together to obtain the final combined standard uncertainty (UC ) as per the equation ( 6) (9,(13)(14)(15)(16) .…”
Section: Combined Standard Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…along with the compressive strength of some tested materials obtained from industrial waste. [14] 4.5 -17.5 Concrete with alum sludge (treated in a furnace at 200 °C) [29] 24.0 -48.0 Concrete with Lime Stone [29] 33.0 -53.0 Concrete with quarry dust [29] 36.0 -65.0 Concrete with solidified wastewater treatment sludge [30] 3.9 -5.8…”
Section: Figure 2 Granulometric Composition Of Solidified Powder Frac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-destructive and micro-destructive testing methods for estimating the compressive strength of concrete have been studied extensively, and many methods have been put into practical use and standardized. The most commonly used NDT methods are a rebound hammer test [4][5][6][7] and ultrasonic pulse velocity [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. A combination of those methods [15][16][17] is also widely used to evaluate the existing concrete structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%