2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2349478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncovalent interactions between organometallic metallocene complexes and single-walled carbon nanotubes

Abstract: First principles density functional pseudopotential calculations have been used to investigate the nature of interactions between single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and intercalated transition metal metallocene complexes, M(eta-C(5)H(5))(2) (MCp(2)). Three composites, MCp(2)-graphene (d(t)=infinity), MCp(2)@(17,0) (d(t)=1.33 nm), and MCp(2)@(12,0) (d(t)=0.94 nm) (where M=Fe,Co), have been studied to probe the influence of the nanotube diameter (d(t)) on the nature and magnitude of the interactions. Theoret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations in the DFT model used is the overestimation of the binding energy caused by weak interactions. [78] This has been first highlighted for the modelling of a supramolecular benzene dimer. [79,78] For this simple aromatic stacking model interaction DFT calculations yielded an inter-ring distance of 3.06 Å and a binding energy of −0.48 eV, whereas higher level modelling (CCSD (T)) calculations gave corresponding values of 4.1 Å and −0.05 eV respectively.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Investigations On the Ndi@swnt Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the limitations in the DFT model used is the overestimation of the binding energy caused by weak interactions. [78] This has been first highlighted for the modelling of a supramolecular benzene dimer. [79,78] For this simple aromatic stacking model interaction DFT calculations yielded an inter-ring distance of 3.06 Å and a binding energy of −0.48 eV, whereas higher level modelling (CCSD (T)) calculations gave corresponding values of 4.1 Å and −0.05 eV respectively.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Investigations On the Ndi@swnt Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[78] This has been first highlighted for the modelling of a supramolecular benzene dimer. [79,78] For this simple aromatic stacking model interaction DFT calculations yielded an inter-ring distance of 3.06 Å and a binding energy of −0.48 eV, whereas higher level modelling (CCSD (T)) calculations gave corresponding values of 4.1 Å and −0.05 eV respectively. [79] A similar computational approach was applied hereby (see Supporting Information), and was detailed in a previous publication.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Investigations On the Ndi@swnt Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,14,15,18 To further characterize the FeCp 2 encapsulation effect, FeCp 2 @SWCNTs with varying diameters required investigation. In a previous report, SWCNTs produced by the high pressure carbon monoxide (HiPco) method were used as templates for FeCp 2 @SWCNTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the data presented in reports on the experimental and theoretical investigations of the electronic properties of filled SWCNTs, the following substances have an electron donor effect on the nanotubes: molecules -organic molecules (tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE) and tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) [48,356]) and organometallic molecules (Co(C 5 H 5 ) 2 , Co(C 5 H 4 C 2 H 5 ) 2 [47,399,400], Fe(C 5 H 5 ) 2 [50,260,262,263,265,267,399,400], Ce(C 5 H 5 ) 3 [51,269], M(C 5 H 5 ) 2 , M= V, Cr, Mn, Ni [399]) and simple substances -metals (Ag [46,293,294,296,315,365,401], Cu [293,295], Eu [272,402], Li, K [403], Ti, Zn, Co, Ni, Fe, Mo, Gd, Cu [402,[404][405][406][407][408][409][410]). …”
Section: Typical Donors Of Electrons and Methods Of Their Encapsulationmentioning
confidence: 99%