We used a magneto-optical Kerr effect microscope to measure 180 ± magnetization reversal in a high coercivity CoCr 10 Ta 4 thin film subjected to nanosecond field pulses. Exponential magnetization decay occurs for pulse duration t p , 10 ns followed by logarithmic decay for t p . 10 ns, indicating a crossover from nonequilibrium magnetization relaxation at short t p to metastable equilibrium and thermal relaxation for longer t p . We conclude that the nonequilibrium magnetization relaxation time ͑t n ͒ and that the average relaxation time of microscopic thermal fluctuations ͑t 0 ͒ is t n t 0 ഠ 5 ns. PACS numbers: 75.40.Gb, 75.50.Ss, 75.50.Vv The time required for 180 ± magnetization reversal has recently received renewed interest primarily because of its relevance to the data storage industry [1,2]. A 180 ± magnetic reversal is initiated typically in one of two ways: either we apply a magnetic field so that the energy barrier to reversal remains finite and reversal occurs by thermally assisted hopping or we apply a large enough field so that reversal is energetically favored independent of thermal effects. In the latter case, the magnetic reversal proceeds with some nonequilibrium or "dynamic" relaxation time t n that has been measured to be on the order of nanoseconds or less in exchange coupled materials with uniform, uniaxial anisotropy [3][4][5][6]. Calculations using the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation have yielded a value of t n in good agreement with the experimental results for the simple case of coherent rotation of the magnetization [4,6]. In the case of a finite energy barrier E B , reversal occurs with the scaled relaxation time given by the Arrhenius-Néel law, t th t 0 exp͑E B ͞k b T ͒, where t 0 is the average relaxation time in response to a thermal fluctuation [7]. Brown calculated t 0 for a single-domain Stoner-Wohlfarth particle to be in the range 10 ps , t 0 , 1 ns [8], the exact magnitude depending upon several parameters, such as applied field H and magnetic damping constant a, which reflects the decay rate of coherent magnetic precession. Experimental determination of t 0 has also been limited to simple systems, such as single-crystal Ni, that exhibit exponential magnetization decay (indicating a single energy barrier), in which case t 0 was determined to be on the order of several nanoseconds [9].For a more complex system containing a large number of interacting magnetic reversal volumes and a wide distribution of energy barriers-such as high coercivity magnetic recording media with weak exchange coupling and random anisotropy-the magnetic relaxation times (t n and t 0 ) cannot be calculated analytically, but instead must be determined using complex micromagnetic simulations [10]. Experimental determination of these relaxation times for such complex systems have been ambiguous [11][12][13], in part because the broad distribution of energy barriers has prevented the clear separation of nonequilibrium reversal and thermally assisted reversal.In this Letter, we report on the first un...