2005
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2005.853791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncoherent sequence detection receiver for Bluetooth systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BER performance is compared for different values of phase noise standard deviation σ ∆ . We can observe that the proposed algorithm performs better than that in [9] and, when the value of σ ∆ is low, it performs quite close to the receiver which perfectly knows the modulation index and the channel phase (also shown in the figure).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The BER performance is compared for different values of phase noise standard deviation σ ∆ . We can observe that the proposed algorithm performs better than that in [9] and, when the value of σ ∆ is low, it performs quite close to the receiver which perfectly knows the modulation index and the channel phase (also shown in the figure).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…2, we compare the performance of the proposed algorithm with that of the noncoherent detector in [9]. In this latter case, the modulation index is estimated using an estimation period of N e = 50 symbols and parameters α and β described in [9] have been optimized by simulations. The BER performance is compared for different values of phase noise standard deviation σ ∆ .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The paper in [8] presents an improvement on the GFSK modulation method by using maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE), based on a linearized model of the modulation. Furthermore, the authors were dedicated to evolving a scheme that had MLSE-oriented detection using the Viterbi equalizer considering a GFSK inherent inter symbol interference (ISI), with the channel gain sensitivity of 0 -7 dB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our results suggest that the performance of the differential detectors is quite close to the ML coherent receiver at small values of h, making them an attractive choice for bandwidth-limited systems. Alternatively, noncoherent detectors [15], [16] can be employed where the information is estimated in the presence of phase uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%