2016
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2016.2516961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Zero Intercept Frequency: An Accurate Method to Determine the Integral Temperature of Li-Ion Batteries

Abstract: Abstract-A new impedance-based approach is introduced in which the integral battery temperature is related to other frequencies than the recently developed zero-intercept frequency (ZIF). The advantage of the proposed non-zero-interceptfrequency (NZIF) method is that measurement interferences, resulting from the current flowing through the battery (pack), can be avoided at these frequencies. This gives higher signal-tonoise ratios (SNR) and, consequently, more accurate temperature measurements. A theoretical a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if we accept the problem of crosstalk and are able to find a solution for this problem, impedance‐based temperature estimation would be a suitable method for application in battery packs. Both of the aforementioned artefacts are known to influence the EIS measurements, as was shown for (dis)charge currents by Raijmakers et al and for crosstalk interference . However, a solution on how to deal with the combination of these two artefacts and how to conduct impedance‐based temperature estimation for battery packs accurately has not yet been presented in the existing literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, if we accept the problem of crosstalk and are able to find a solution for this problem, impedance‐based temperature estimation would be a suitable method for application in battery packs. Both of the aforementioned artefacts are known to influence the EIS measurements, as was shown for (dis)charge currents by Raijmakers et al and for crosstalk interference . However, a solution on how to deal with the combination of these two artefacts and how to conduct impedance‐based temperature estimation for battery packs accurately has not yet been presented in the existing literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The measurement frequency can be selected by the user; however, the amplitude and measurement time of the excitation signal are fixed. Moreover, note that the SCS is a passive measurement device, ie, the sinusoidal excitation signal is generated by switching a resistor in parallel with the battery cell using a pulse‐density–modulated switching signal of a sine wave . In order to obtain a sine wave perturbation using the passive circuit, the aforementioned DC component is needed.…”
Section: Impedance‐based Temperature Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three popular approaches to assess the heat generation in the batteries are illustrated in Eq. (1), which have been widely applied in real-time applications [24][25][26][27]. …”
Section: Battery Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of battery SOC, SOH and temperature on the EIS measurements is analysed, and the excitation signal frequency is selected so that the measured EIS is dominated by temperature, and independent of the battery SOC and SOH. Raijmakers et al [99] also proposed battery sensorless temperature estimation methods using EIS measurements, and compared the performance of different EIS-based battery temperature estimation methods [100] under both thermal equilibrium states and dynamic load conditions. However, it is worth noting that those battery internal temperature estimation methods using the battery impedance measurement at a single frequency can only give an 'averaged' battery temperature, rather than the temperature distribution field or the peak internal temperature, under inhomogeneous or transient temperature distribution conditions.…”
Section: Internal Temperature Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%