2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-vanishing of Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients

Abstract: For any periodic function f : N → C with period q, we study the Dirichlet series L(s, f ) := n≥1 f (n)/n s . It is well-known that this admits an analytic continuation to the entire complex plane except at s = 1, where it has a simple pole with residueThus, the function is analytic at s = 1 when ρ = 0 and in this case, we study its non-vanishing using the theory of linear forms in logarithms and Dirichlet L-series. In this way, we give new proofs of an old criterion of Okada for the non-vanishing of L(1, f ) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous two sections give a characterization of algebraic-valued periodic arithmetic functions, odd and even respectively whose L-series vanish at s = 1. In this section, we mention a theorem of Ram Murty and Tapas Chatterjee [4] which nicely ties the nonvanishing of the odd and the even functions to give us the characterization required. The proof in their paper is incorrect as care was not taken regarding the branch of logarithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous two sections give a characterization of algebraic-valued periodic arithmetic functions, odd and even respectively whose L-series vanish at s = 1. In this section, we mention a theorem of Ram Murty and Tapas Chatterjee [4] which nicely ties the nonvanishing of the odd and the even functions to give us the characterization required. The proof in their paper is incorrect as care was not taken regarding the branch of logarithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since c j (x) = c j (q − x), R belongs to the Z-module generated by (5). Indeed all relations R := q−1 x=1 C x a x = 0 in the Z-module generated by (4) satisfy C x = −C q−x , which along with the fact that C j (x) = C j (q − x) (which stem from the evenness of f ) imply that c j (x) = 0 ∀ 1 ≤ x ≤ q − 1. Thus, R is a Z-linear combination of (5).…”
Section: Even Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We state some simple applications of Baker's theorem as were done in [6], [9] and [11] to resolve the problem of transcendental nature of algebraic linear combination of π, logarithm of non-zero algebraic numbers and positive real units. We will use the next proposition due to Chatterjee and Gun to prove some of the theorems in the later section.…”
Section: Notations and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work was generalized by Gun, Murty and Rath [4] to the setting of algebraic number fields. The forthcoming paper [2] gives new proofs of some of the background results of this area. We also refer the reader to [12] for an expanded survey of the early history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%