Proceedings of International Reliability Physics Symposium RELPHY-96 1996
DOI: 10.1109/relphy.1996.492068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-uniform current flow through thin oxide after Fowler-Nordheim current stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To keep this contribution negligible, the oxide thickness of Flash cells has barely scaled with the technology generations, going from about 10 nm in the first prototype [3] to about 7-8 nm in the latest nodes [182]. However, experimental data [183][184][185][186][187][188] have demonstrated that, even if the SILC is reduced, there is a small number of cells that can exhibit a high leakage after stress, in analogy with the statistical behavior of RTN. An example of this effect is reported in Figure 16, where thin-oxide (6.5 nm) NOR Flash arrays were cycled heavily (10 4 P/E cycles) before being subjected to positive (left) or negative (right) oxide field to induce a V T shift [189]: note the distribution tails made up of cells featuring an enhanced leakage with respect to the main part of the distribution, whose shift is due to the intrinsic FN tunnelig current.…”
Section: Retention After Cycling and Silcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To keep this contribution negligible, the oxide thickness of Flash cells has barely scaled with the technology generations, going from about 10 nm in the first prototype [3] to about 7-8 nm in the latest nodes [182]. However, experimental data [183][184][185][186][187][188] have demonstrated that, even if the SILC is reduced, there is a small number of cells that can exhibit a high leakage after stress, in analogy with the statistical behavior of RTN. An example of this effect is reported in Figure 16, where thin-oxide (6.5 nm) NOR Flash arrays were cycled heavily (10 4 P/E cycles) before being subjected to positive (left) or negative (right) oxide field to induce a V T shift [189]: note the distribution tails made up of cells featuring an enhanced leakage with respect to the main part of the distribution, whose shift is due to the intrinsic FN tunnelig current.…”
Section: Retention After Cycling and Silcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In particular, anomalous SILC on local spots has been reported, which is some orders of magnitude larger than the average SILC, and it is a major factor in bit errors. [10][11][12][13][14][15] Therefore, it is important to reduce the probability of localized SILC generation in order to improve the reliability of flash memories. Many models for explaining SILC generation and flow mechanisms have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SILC causes a severe limitation of the tunnel oxide scaling because a thinner oxide indicates a larger SILC [1]. Furthermore in flash memories anomalously larger leakage current that occurs at a localized spot, causes a severe bit error [2][3][4]. Such a phenomenon is often called anomalous SILC in flash memories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%