2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-slip-type restoring force characteristics of an exposed-type column base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model is validated with six available physical tests on XCBs with cantilever columns exhibiting various hysteretic behavior characteristics. In particular, the tests conducted by: (a) Takamatsu and Tamai (2005) 45 (noted as specimens Fix‐Ab‐N = 0C and Fix‐Ab‐N = 0.1C); (b) Trautner et al (2016) 27 (specimen S1S2); (c) Yamanishi et al (2009) 24 (specimen S‐Var); and (d) Gomez et al (2010) 25 (specimens #2 and #5). Each simulation is performed using a dynamic algorithm (ie, quasi‐static simulation) in order to stabilize the simulation with damping forces, since the simulation can be unstable especially when stiffness changes abruptly.…”
Section: Proposed Xcb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed model is validated with six available physical tests on XCBs with cantilever columns exhibiting various hysteretic behavior characteristics. In particular, the tests conducted by: (a) Takamatsu and Tamai (2005) 45 (noted as specimens Fix‐Ab‐N = 0C and Fix‐Ab‐N = 0.1C); (b) Trautner et al (2016) 27 (specimen S1S2); (c) Yamanishi et al (2009) 24 (specimen S‐Var); and (d) Gomez et al (2010) 25 (specimens #2 and #5). Each simulation is performed using a dynamic algorithm (ie, quasi‐static simulation) in order to stabilize the simulation with damping forces, since the simulation can be unstable especially when stiffness changes abruptly.…”
Section: Proposed Xcb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to Figure 4B, the proposed model depicts the increase in the expected flexural strength of the XCB due to the presence of the compressive axial load. Slight differences in the flexural stiffness during the initial loading/unloading may be attributed to the flexibility of the steel beam foundation 45 …”
Section: Proposed Xcb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of these research works (e.g., Ikenaga et al 2006;Mackinven et al 2007;Chou and Chen 2011;Chi and Liu 2012;Yamanishi et al 2012;Takamatsu and Tamai 2005), have focused on the use of rocking column bases where post-tensioned (PT) bars, or yielding bolts, were used to control rocking behavior and to provide self-centering capability, while dedicated devices were used to dissipate seismic energy. Several different configurations were investigated considering different column sections, different lengths and different positions of the PT bars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%