2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation of a Rocking Damage-Free Steel Column Base with Friction Devices

Abstract: The paper presents the experimental evaluation of an earthquake-resilient rocking damage-free steel column base, previously proposed and numerically investigated by the authors. The column base uses post-tensioned high-strength steel bars to control its rocking behavior and friction devices to dissipate seismic energy. It is equipped with a circular steel plate with rounded edges, which is used as a rocking base. The rounded edges prevent stress concentration and damage of the contact surfaces, while the circu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These configurations allowed the achievement of superior behaviour under loading in the column strong-axis direction, while damage and stiffness degradation were observed under loading of the column in the weak-axis direction. [32] presented and experimentally investigated [33] a rocking damage-free steel CB equipped with FDs and high-strength steel PT bars. Non-linear dynamic analyses were carried out showing the potential of the CB in preventing the first-floor column yielding and in eliminating residual deformations in steel MRFs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These configurations allowed the achievement of superior behaviour under loading in the column strong-axis direction, while damage and stiffness degradation were observed under loading of the column in the weak-axis direction. [32] presented and experimentally investigated [33] a rocking damage-free steel CB equipped with FDs and high-strength steel PT bars. Non-linear dynamic analyses were carried out showing the potential of the CB in preventing the first-floor column yielding and in eliminating residual deformations in steel MRFs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the third retrofit scheme (R-C) aims at avoiding damage in the MRF; therefore, the roof displacement is limited to the step at which any of the MRF elements overpasses the IO PL, based on the AC defined by the ASCE 41-17 [14]. Nowadays, there is considerable interest in the definition of seismic-resilient structures (e.g., [11,21,22]) and this third retrofit option aims at limiting the damage to the BRBs only at the CP PL hence allowing an easy and quick repairability of the structure. Table 1 The design process is carried out by considering an equivalent Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDoF) system approximation [23], based on the bi-linearised (system base shear vs. roof displacement) capacity curves from the original bare frame, with an initial stiffness (k0) equivalent to the ratio between the 60% of the maximum base shear (Fu), and its corresponding roof displacement.…”
Section: Buckling Restrained Braces (Brbs) Retrofitting Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been shown that protecting column bases (CBs) from damage is an essential requirement for seismic‐resilient structures. To this scope, several research studies proposed and investigated the use of SCDF connections in CBs 27–30 . Freddi et al 27,28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%