2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15612-5_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-repetitive Strings over Alphabet Lists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Is every path nonrepetitively 3-choosable? [43,69,108]? Note that a simple adaptation to the proof of Theorem 3.6 shows that every path is list 3-colourable such that every subpath with at least four vertices is nonrepetitively coloured; that is, the only repetitively coloured subpaths have two vertices.…”
Section: Theorem 36 ([131]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is every path nonrepetitively 3-choosable? [43,69,108]? Note that a simple adaptation to the proof of Theorem 3.6 shows that every path is list 3-colourable such that every subpath with at least four vertices is nonrepetitively coloured; that is, the only repetitively coloured subpaths have two vertices.…”
Section: Theorem 36 ([131]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is every path nonrepetitively list 3-colourable? [42,70,107]? Note that a simple adaptation to the proof of Theorem 3.6 shows that every path is list 3colourable such that every subpath with at least four vertices is nonrepetitively coloured; that is, the only repetitively coloured subpaths have two vertices.…”
Section: Theorem 36 ([130]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first conjectured by Grytczuk [6] that the nonrepetitive list chromatic number of any path is in fact at most 3. This conjecture has been mentioned many times, but not much progress has been made in the direction of proving or disproving it (see for instance [5,6,7,9,13,14,16,20,21] for some of the mentions of this problem).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%