2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non randomness in spatial distribution in two inland water species malacostracans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This association of aggregated pattern and negative binomial distribution has been reported by classic literature about benthic fauna (25), as well as applied entomological studies (22). This pattern was reported for inland water crustaceans in Chilean Patagonia (24,26), for intertidal invertebrates in northern Patagonian coast (27), and the gastropod Echinolittorina peruviana in Antofagasta rocky shore (12). The existence of uniform distribution in four of 19 samples probably would be to interspecific interactions, probably competence with other species that share ecological niche (5,6,7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This association of aggregated pattern and negative binomial distribution has been reported by classic literature about benthic fauna (25), as well as applied entomological studies (22). This pattern was reported for inland water crustaceans in Chilean Patagonia (24,26), for intertidal invertebrates in northern Patagonian coast (27), and the gastropod Echinolittorina peruviana in Antofagasta rocky shore (12). The existence of uniform distribution in four of 19 samples probably would be to interspecific interactions, probably competence with other species that share ecological niche (5,6,7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Data analysis: in a first step, it was compared the C. cinereus abundances for each site, and for two groups of sites (protected and human altered sites), homocedasticity and normality were determined for data, and due the absence of both conditions it was done a non-parametric tests [15] To each specie counting data, was obtained in first instance a variance mean ratio, first for determine if the specie has random if the value is 1, uniform if the value is lower than 1, or aggregated distribution, if the value is upper than 1, [22,23,24]. Once determined the spatial pattern, random, uniform or aggregated, it determined if the species have Poisson, binomial or negative binomial distribution respectively, the analysis was done manually using Excel software and literature descriptions [22,23,24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e results about the presence of negative binomial distribution in P. minutus and N. morio agree with similar observations for inland waters crustacean and mollusks (De los Ríos-Escalante & Mansilla, 2017), that would be explained as survival strategies such as et al, 2019). Finally the absence of negative binomial distribution pattern observed for N. pyramidalis pascua can be possible, considering that aggregated pattern is not obligatory associated with negative binomial distribution (Elliot, 1999;Fernandes et al, 2003;De los Ríos-Escalante, 2017) Th is result is the fi rst ecological community view point for Easter Island coastal marine communities. In this scenario, the marked diff erence in mollusks species composition in two data sets, is similar to observations on intertidal crustaceans in the same site in 2010 (De los Ríos-Escalante, 2011), that were absent in fi eld observations in 2014 (De los Ríos-Escalante & Ibáñez-Arancibia, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernandez et al (2014) did a detailed reviewing about marine invertebrates on Easter Island, but they do not specify more details about specifi c sites within the Island. One of the groups with more references are mollusks (Rehder, 1980;Osorio & Cantuarias, 1989;Brook, 1998;Letelier et al, 2003;Coloma et al, 2004;Dell'Angelo et al, 2004;Raines, 2004Raines, , 2007 and decapod crustaceans (Retamal, 2004;De los Ríos-Escalante, 2011;De los Ríos-Escalante & Ibáñez-Arancibia, 2016, 2017, with more studies based on single records. From these studies only Coloma et al (2004) did a more restricted research based on abundances in intertidal environments including abundances for reported species, but without more ecological analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alterations in the continuity of water flow and sudden increase in flow; and the destruction of native forest due to fires, or in favour of agriculture of plantations, which significantly affects nutrient cycles and the dynamics of aquatic communities (López-Rojo et al, 2019). On this basis, it would be necessary more ecological studies, that involves habitats density in different ecosystems for understand its behaviour such as has been described for other species of Aegla genus (De los Ríos-Escalante, 2017;De los Ríos-Escalante et al, 2019). Also, it is necessary more studies about distribution of Aegla genus considering their biogeography at regional scales (De los Ríos-Escalante et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%