Non-psychostimulant drugs of abuse and anxiogenic drugs activate with differential selectivity dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat
Abstract:In rats vertically implanted with concentric dialysis probes in the medial prefrontal cortex and in the medial nucleus accumbens, morphine, ethanol and nicotine failed to modify extracellular dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex at doses that were fully effective in raising extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. Conversely, the aversive/anxiogenic drugs picrotoxin, pentylenetetrazol and FG 7142, administered at subconvulsant doses, increased extracellular dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex … Show more
“…As expected from previous results (Rossetti et al 1993;Bassareo et al 1996), in the PFC acute morphine administration (5 mg/kg IP) reduced extracellular NA concentration by about 30%, but failed to modify extracellular DA levels ( Fig. 2A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, the lack of effect of acute morphine on extracellular DA is in apparent contrast to the stimulant effect of morphine on VTA neurons (Matthews and German 1984), and on the increased DA output in the nucleus accumbens (Pothos et al 1991;Bassareo et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, acute morphine activates the firing and bursting activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Matthews and German 1984), and increases dopamine (DA) release in the nucleus accumbens (Pothos et al 1991;Bassareo et al 1996).…”
The results suggest that: a) morphine-stimulated DA release from DA terminals is compensated by reduced DA release from NA terminals; b) morphine abstinence-induced inhibition of DA release from DA terminals is overshadowed by a marked increase in DA released from NA terminals. Thus, the paradoxical response of PFC DA to morphine and morphine abstinence may be explained by the fact that extracellular DA in the PFC mainly represents the amine co-released from NA terminals.
“…As expected from previous results (Rossetti et al 1993;Bassareo et al 1996), in the PFC acute morphine administration (5 mg/kg IP) reduced extracellular NA concentration by about 30%, but failed to modify extracellular DA levels ( Fig. 2A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, the lack of effect of acute morphine on extracellular DA is in apparent contrast to the stimulant effect of morphine on VTA neurons (Matthews and German 1984), and on the increased DA output in the nucleus accumbens (Pothos et al 1991;Bassareo et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, acute morphine activates the firing and bursting activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Matthews and German 1984), and increases dopamine (DA) release in the nucleus accumbens (Pothos et al 1991;Bassareo et al 1996).…”
The results suggest that: a) morphine-stimulated DA release from DA terminals is compensated by reduced DA release from NA terminals; b) morphine abstinence-induced inhibition of DA release from DA terminals is overshadowed by a marked increase in DA released from NA terminals. Thus, the paradoxical response of PFC DA to morphine and morphine abstinence may be explained by the fact that extracellular DA in the PFC mainly represents the amine co-released from NA terminals.
“…An acute systemic injection of nicotine, such as with other drugs of abuse, increases the extracellular concentrations of DA in the terminal fields of the mesolimbic system (Imperato et al 1986;Maisonneuve and Glick 1999;Mifsud et al 1989;Pontieri et al 1996; for a review see , the nigrostriatal pathway (Di Chiara and Imperato 1988;Toth et al 1992), and the mesocortical pathway (Bassareo et al 1996;Summers and Giacobini 1995;Toth et al 1992). Repeated nicotine injections in rats (0.4 mg/kg nicotine tartrate subcutaneously for 7 days) increased the dopamine release caused by local nicotine administration in the striatum, as measured with in vivo microdialysis (Marshall et al 1997).…”
Section: Downstream Sites Of Action: the Mesolimbic Dopamine Neuronsmentioning
While no single current animal model may capture the experience of human smoking or nicotine addiction, increasingly, separate animal models are capturing the full spectrum of behavioral and neurobiological dimensions of this complex condition.
“…The mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system, referred to as the brain reward circuit, has suggested a strong role of dopamine (DA) in the effects of addictive drugs, including alcohol. DA has been implicated in rewarding effects, such as the subjective experience of "pleasure" (Brodie et al 1999;Hyman and Malenka 2001), in mechanisms involved in the development of dependence (Bassareo et al 1996;Giacchino and Henriksen 1996;Peters et al 2000), and in reinforcing actions of abused drugs such as alcohol (Weiss and Porrino 2002). In fact, many structures of the brain reward circuit show increases in the turnover of DA after alcohol administration (Tabakoff and Hoffman 1992;Di Chiara 1995;O'Brien et al 1995).…”
These results showed that ETOH administered directly in the mPFC disrupts short- and long-term spatial working memory. The increase of the disruptive effect of ETOH produced by a dopaminergic blockage, particularly in the mPFC, suggests that the dopaminergic neurotransmission in this cortical area might modulate ETOH effects on spatial working memory.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.