Closure of stomata upon pathogenesis is among the earliest plant immune responses. However, our knowledge is very limited about the dependency of plant defence responses to chitosan (CHT) on external factors (e.g., time of the day, presence, or absence of light) in intact plants. CHT induced stomatal closure before dark/light transition in leaves treated at 17:00 hrs and stomata were closed at 09:00 hrs in plants treated at dawn and in the morning. CHT was able to induce generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in guard cells in the first part of the light phase, but significant nitric oxide production was observable only at 15:00 hrs. The actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (Φ PSII ) decreased upon CHT treatments at 09:00 hrs in guard cells but it declined only at dawn in mesophyll cells after the treatment at 17:00 hrs. Expression of Pathogenesis-related 1 (PR1) and Ethylene Response Factor 1 were already increased at dawn in the CHT-treated leaves but PR1 expression was inhibited in the dark. CHT-induced systemic response was also observed in the distal leaves of CHT-treated ones. Our results suggest a delayed and daytime-dependent defence response of tomato plants after CHT treatment at night and under darkness.Plants 2020, 9, 59 2 of 21 the day, which in turn regulates stomatal aperture and thereby stomatal defence against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis thaliana [14]. Another component involved in the clock-regulated stomata-based pre-invasive defence is the time for coffee (TIC), a night-expressed clock gene. TIC inhibits JA signalling in the evening and contributes to a stronger JA responsiveness in the morning [15,16]. Thus, both the daytime and/or the presence or absence of light seem to be crucial factor in the phytohormone-mediated response of plants against various pathogens.It can be concluded that diurnal effects of light can significantly influence plant-pathogen interactions. It is well known that light can directly inhibit spore germination, germ tube growth, and reduces the infection efficiency of many pathogenic fungi, such as Botrytis cinerea [17], Fusarium graminearum [18], Phakopsora pachyrhizi [19], and Puccinia hemerocallidis [20]. Thus, plants can be subjected to a greater challenge by many fungal pathogens at night than during the day [3]. Although stomata are closed at night and provide the first line of defence in the dark, at dawn stomata start to open thus provide infection window for many pathogens [21]. Decreased susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea was observed in Arabidopsis thaliana after inoculation at dawn compared with the night [22]. Besides rapid production of ROS and RNS at the infection sites, the initiation of the biosynthesis of SA and JA and increased expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes were also induced, which resulted in the hypersensitive response (HR). The localized contact with pathogens can further activate systemic acquired resistance (SAR) even at the whole plant level, which can protect the infected plant against the subsequent path...