2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2017.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-negative infrared patch-image model: Robust target-background separation via partial sum minimization of singular values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compared nonlocal correlation-based models include Stable Multi-subspace Learning (SMSL) [36], Infrared Patch-Image model (IPI) [32], Reweight Infrared Patch-Image model (ReWIPI) [33], Non-negative Infrared Patch-Image based on Partial Sum minimization of singular values (NIPPS) [42], Reweight Infrared Patch-Tensor model (RIPT) [34]. The objective functions and parameter settings for each model are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparison To the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The compared nonlocal correlation-based models include Stable Multi-subspace Learning (SMSL) [36], Infrared Patch-Image model (IPI) [32], Reweight Infrared Patch-Image model (ReWIPI) [33], Non-negative Infrared Patch-Image based on Partial Sum minimization of singular values (NIPPS) [42], Reweight Infrared Patch-Tensor model (RIPT) [34]. The objective functions and parameter settings for each model are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparison To the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some popular nonconvex regularizers include log-sum penalty [38], truncated nuclear norm [39], partial sum minimization of singular values [40] and Schatten p quasi-norm [41], and so on. Especially, Dai et al [42] used the partial sum minimization of singular values replacing the nuclear nom minimization to improve the small target detection rate. However, for this method, it is difficult to estimate a suitable rank to achieve exact detection in real situations.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call this phenomenon the rare structure effect. In contrast, the nonlocal prior methods [26], [29], [30] suffer from the salient edge residuals. Its intrinsic reason is because the strong edge is also a sparse component as the same as the target due to lack of sufficient similar samples.…”
Section: B Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baselines and Parameter settings. The proposed algorithm is compared with ten state-of-the-art solutions, including three filtering based methods (Max-Median [10], Top-Hat [48], TDLMS [9]), three HVS based methods (PFT [49], MPCM [19], WLDM [23]), and four recently developed lowrank methods (IPI [26], PRPCA [50], WIPI [29], NIPPS [30]). Tab.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prior information is the key to the success of single-frame-based methods, also in many other fields [9][10][11]. Up to now, the consistency of backgrounds [12][13][14][15], the saliency of targets [16][17][18][19], the sparsity of targets and the low rank of backgrounds [20][21][22][23][24] are the most used assumptions to detect infrared small targets in single image from different perspectives. The former two are local priors, whereas the latter two are nonlocal priors which are usually exploited simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%