2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa71a8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Maxwellian Analysis of the Transition-region Line Profiles Observed by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph

Abstract: We investigate the nature of the spectral line profiles for transition region ions observed with the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS). In this context, we have analyzed an active-region observation performed by IRIS in its 1400Å spectral window. The transition-region lines are found to exhibit significant wings in their spectral profiles, which can be well-fitted with non-Maxwellian κ-distribution. The fit with a κ-distribution can perform better than a double Gaussian fit, especially for the stron… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(171 reference statements)
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensities of the S iv and O iv transition region lines were measured by a Gaussian fit to the IRIS FUV spectra. As noted by Polito et al (2016) and Dudík et al (2017) these lines sometimes show departures from Gaussian shapes and can be well-fitted by a Lorentzian or double Gaussian function. We used a double Gaussian to fit each line and cross-checked each fit by performing an additional single Gaussian fit, finding that the line intensities are consistent with the double Gaussian method to within ∼ 15 − 20%.…”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The intensities of the S iv and O iv transition region lines were measured by a Gaussian fit to the IRIS FUV spectra. As noted by Polito et al (2016) and Dudík et al (2017) these lines sometimes show departures from Gaussian shapes and can be well-fitted by a Lorentzian or double Gaussian function. We used a double Gaussian to fit each line and cross-checked each fit by performing an additional single Gaussian fit, finding that the line intensities are consistent with the double Gaussian method to within ∼ 15 − 20%.…”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 75%
“…At time t = P/2s, the electron beam is switched on until t = P, when it is switched off for another P/2. The distribution of plasma with the electron beam is represented by a κ-distribution (e.g., Olbert 1968;Vasyliunas 1968a,b;Owocki & Scudder 1983;Livadiotis 2015;Dzifčáková et al 2015;Dudík et al 2017b),…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular example is the Si iv doublet at 1393.8 and 1402.8 Å, whose peak formation temperature should lie at log(T max [K]) = 4.9 under equilibrium conditions that are characterized by a Maxwellian distribution (Dudík et al 2014a). However, their intensities are usually enhanced by a factor of five or more compared to the neighboring intercombination O iv lines that are formed at similar temperatures of log(T max [K]) = 5.15 (e.g., Doyle & Raymond 1984;Judge et al 1995;Curdt et al 2001;Yan et al 2015;Polito et al 2016;Doschek et al 2016;Dudík et al 2017b). Furthermore, the TR is known to be highly dynamic, with intensity changes on the order of several seconds or tens of seconds (e.g., Testa et al 2013;Régnier et al 2014;Hansteen et al 2014;Peter et al 2014;Tian et al 2014Tian et al , 2016Vissers et al 2015;Tajfirouze et al 2016;Martínez-Sykora et al 2016;Hou et al 2016;Warren et al 2016;Samanta et al 2017) as identified in recent observations performed by the Interface Region Imaging This dynamics represents a modeling challenge, since the intensity changes can be shorter than the change in ionization equilibration timescales (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation is that the forward modeling erroneously assumed that the lines were optically thin, which may or may not hold true for C II (Rathore & Carlsson 2015) and O I (Lin & Carlsson 2015), depending on the particular conditions of the event. It is also possible that the line shapes may be non-Maxwellian, which can affect the opacity (Dudík et al 2017). We seek to directly test the importance of NLTE effects by redoing the simulations with the improved model, and then synthesizing the emission with a radiative transfer solver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%