2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-local and localized analyses of non-reactive solute transport in bounded randomly heterogeneous porous media: Theoretical framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that perturbative solutions of advective-dispersion equations can sometimes result in bimodal behavior of averaged concentration fields [Jarman and Russell, 2003;Morales-Casique et al, 2006;Jarman and Tartakovsky, 2008]. However, herein we do not encounter such concerns.…”
Section: Average Flow Equationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…It is known that perturbative solutions of advective-dispersion equations can sometimes result in bimodal behavior of averaged concentration fields [Jarman and Russell, 2003;Morales-Casique et al, 2006;Jarman and Tartakovsky, 2008]. However, herein we do not encounter such concerns.…”
Section: Average Flow Equationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Many papers have documented the improved fits that may be generated (see the extensive review by Berkowitz et al [2006]). These studies validate the fact that nonlocality is the by-product of upscaling [Neuman, 1993;Cushman and Ginn, 1993;Morales-Casique et al, 2006;Dentz and Bolster, 2010]. It is a simple notion that upscaling replaces detailed velocity information with memory kernels in spatial and temporal convolutions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Alternative transport models are proposed to capture the effects of spatial heterogeneities in fractured rocks and the effects of flow channeling or velocity dispersion [14,15]. The models have extended to the mass transfer models with time-or space-dependent dispersion coefficients (e.g., [16]), the multi-rate mass transfer models [17], the continuous time random walk approach [18], the time-domain random walk approach, the fractional advection-dispersion equation approach [19], and the stochastic approach [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%