Non-linear diffusion: Bison on the hoof and on the rail in the United States

Lulka, David

doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.10.019

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Data analysis Knowledge diffusion describes knowledge progress on FMUs concept in both PFMU and stakeholders interaction involved, which analyzed using: 1 Interaction analysis were done using IDS and network analysis. Network analysis used socio-spatial analysis, which was a logical diffusion technique that considering space element and time (Bintarto & Hadisumarmo 1987;Julijanti 2005;Lulka 2008). This analysis illustrates the pattern of communication networks which was built among stakeholders.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Latour (1996) stated that diffusion process could also be analyzed based on domestication as the central point in human non-human relations (Lulka 2008). Lulka (2008) (2006) was used to knowing stakeholders-interaction in response to knowledge on FMUs concept, actors position in network, and power dynamics that accelerating or inhibiting it. An understanding of stakeholders behavior in policy process could also be analyzed through 4 dimensions, i.e.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Policy Adoption of Forest Management Unit: A Knowledge Diffusion Analysis

Julijanti

Nugroho

Kartodihardjo

et al. 2014

jtfm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the policy adoption process of Forest Management Unit (FMU) concept, there has been disagreement of stakeholders on FMUs concept. This disagreement is caused by the exchange of knowledge, information, and perception among stakeholders involved. The results of these interactions could speed up, slow down, and prevent the adoption process of FMU policy. The study objective was analyzing process of knowledge diffusion of FMUs development policy and stakeholders interaction in PFMU Batutegi and PFMU Kotaagung Utara, Indonesia. Adoption process was analyzed by the logical diffusion technique based on knowledge time of FMUs concept received and its interaction space. Social interaction among stakeholders was analyzed using method developed by International Development Studies analysis, i.e. interaction among discourse/narrative, actors/networks and politics/interests. The results showed that knowledge diffusion of FMUs concept in both PFMU tends to cascade diffusion. Factors was affecting of it process were network, role of opinion leaders, willingness to know, and understand on FMUs concept. Indicative strategy is needed as anticipating and overcoming an obstacle in its internalization process, i.e. harmonization of legislative and executive relationship, building an opinion the importance of FMU, and optimalizing network for bureaucratic problems.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Policy Adoption of Forest Management Unit: A Knowledge Diffusion Analysis

Julijanti

Nugroho

Kartodihardjo

et al. 2014

jtfm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The relational approach championed by Latour, Callon, Law and others has had an immense influence on the theoretical and methodological development of animal geography since the start (Emel et al, 2002). ANT in particular, as a more-than-human ontology, has become widely used within the field, as a way of destabilizing established fixities and divisions (notably between culture and nature, human and non-human), of emphasizing relational practice and non-human agency (Sayes, 2014) and of revealing multiplicities (Bear and Eden, 2008;Davies, 1999;Jones, 2003;Law and Mol, 2008;Lulka, 2008;Nimmo, 2011;Rodger et al, 2009;Taylor, 2011;Taylor and Carter, 2013;Whatmore and Thorne, 1998). The animal -be it sheep (Law and Mol, 2008) or lobster (Johnson, 2010), octopus (Bear, 2011) or dinoflagelate (Shrader, 2010) -is not only redefined as a component of the social (Latour, 2007), but the very process of definition is fundamentally altered.…”

Section: Messing With the 'Social'mentioning

confidence: 99%