2022
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.8786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-laboratory adaptation to study spatial summation of pain during COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract: During COVID-19 pandemic associated with multiple restrictions research performance is significantly hampered. This experiment aimed to verify, whether it is possible to adapt the experimental pain induction technique and observe the spatial summation of pain (SSp) within the field-like environment (so that it is possible to conduct the experiment outside of the laboratory and obtain similar results). Two variants of the Cold Pressor Task (CPT) were chosen to induce the SSp effect: i) using a professional appa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contiguous SSp induced by cold stimulation was significant and robust ( d z =0.85-0.93), comparable to reports on electrical stimuli 1 , heat 22 , pressure 16 as well as other studies on noxious cold stimulation 19,20,23,41,47 . Participants immersed one segment (radial/ulnar) or the whole hand into cold water and provided overall pain ratings which were characterized by excellent reliability (ICC ≥ 0.85); pain was greater when a larger area was stimulated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contiguous SSp induced by cold stimulation was significant and robust ( d z =0.85-0.93), comparable to reports on electrical stimuli 1 , heat 22 , pressure 16 as well as other studies on noxious cold stimulation 19,20,23,41,47 . Participants immersed one segment (radial/ulnar) or the whole hand into cold water and provided overall pain ratings which were characterized by excellent reliability (ICC ≥ 0.85); pain was greater when a larger area was stimulated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For this task, participants immersed their dominant hand (or its part) in a circulating cold-water bath UTE-24BB (LaboPlay, Bytom, PL). A fixed temperature of 5°C was maintained by the electronic thermostat of the device as this temperature has been shown to produce moderate pain 25 in CPT and robust SSp 41 . Pain intensity was rated using the Verbal Rating Scale used previously 42 which ranges from 0 (no pain at all) to 100 (worst pain imaginable).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the desired water temperature of approximately 5°C, 6 foil ice-cube packs were used (a total of 144 ice cubes) for each experimental condition. An electronic (±0.1□) thermometer was attached to the plastic box [23] to monitor the temperature. This non-laboratory version of the CPT was previously validated and led to comparable SSp induced via laboratory-based cold pressor with water circulation [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An electronic (±0.1□) thermometer was attached to the plastic box [23] to monitor the temperature. This non-laboratory version of the CPT was previously validated and led to comparable SSp induced via laboratory-based cold pressor with water circulation [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem in the context of SSp research, one of the aims for the current study was to replicate the SSp effect, adopting the methodology from the study published by Marchand & Arsenault [ 3 ]. Based on previous studies, applying the CPT paradigm using non-laboratory equipment without water circulation [ 37 , 38 ], the authors decided to additionally test if it is possible to conduct and replicate, SSp outside the laboratory setting [ 23 ]. This novel, yet adopted methodology could enable the conduction of similar replications and preliminary studies for researchers who do not have dedicated equipment for CPT in their laboratories, or it could be used in exceptional situations when conducting research in laboratories is hampered [ 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%