2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of Fe 75 Cr 5 P 9 B 4 C 7 metallic glass with a combination of desired merits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows the plots of the crystallized volume fraction (x) versus the temperature (T) for the first crystallization peak of Cr It has been proved that the KAS and OFW methods are valid for determining the E(x) of MGs with various crystallization peaks or crystallization events, which are favorable for pointing out the difficulty of the crystallization trend and calculating available local Avrami exponent n(x) (a significant nonisothermal crystallization kinetics parameter for estimating the characteristic of nucleation and growth during the crystallization process). 19,24,32,54,55 Rezaei-Shahreza et al 54 for all of these four crystallization peaks obtained by means of FWO (which is another conventional abbreviation for denoting the OFW approach) and KAS were not only in good agreement with each other but also in good agreement with activation energies of the recrystallization process calculated by the Starink isoconversional method. Meanwhile, it was reported that, 32 in the Fe-Cr-P-B-C MG with three crystallization peaks on its DSC curve, the E(x) for its first crystallization peak calculated by KAS and OFW methods were not only similar with each other but also consistent with the results of n(x).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 4 shows the plots of the crystallized volume fraction (x) versus the temperature (T) for the first crystallization peak of Cr It has been proved that the KAS and OFW methods are valid for determining the E(x) of MGs with various crystallization peaks or crystallization events, which are favorable for pointing out the difficulty of the crystallization trend and calculating available local Avrami exponent n(x) (a significant nonisothermal crystallization kinetics parameter for estimating the characteristic of nucleation and growth during the crystallization process). 19,24,32,54,55 Rezaei-Shahreza et al 54 for all of these four crystallization peaks obtained by means of FWO (which is another conventional abbreviation for denoting the OFW approach) and KAS were not only in good agreement with each other but also in good agreement with activation energies of the recrystallization process calculated by the Starink isoconversional method. Meanwhile, it was reported that, 32 in the Fe-Cr-P-B-C MG with three crystallization peaks on its DSC curve, the E(x) for its first crystallization peak calculated by KAS and OFW methods were not only similar with each other but also consistent with the results of n(x).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…19,24,32,54,55 Rezaei-Shahreza et al 54 for all of these four crystallization peaks obtained by means of FWO (which is another conventional abbreviation for denoting the OFW approach) and KAS were not only in good agreement with each other but also in good agreement with activation energies of the recrystallization process calculated by the Starink isoconversional method. Meanwhile, it was reported that, 32 in the Fe-Cr-P-B-C MG with three crystallization peaks on its DSC curve, the E(x) for its first crystallization peak calculated by KAS and OFW methods were not only similar with each other but also consistent with the results of n(x). Additionally, it exhibits that the E(x) for the first crystallization peak calculated by KAS and OFW methods are comparable to each other in a Cu-Zr-Ti MG with three crystallization peaks on its DSC curve, 55 from which the valid crystallization trend for the alloy can be determined.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations