Non-Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output by Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance: A Study of Reproducibility and Comparison With Thermodilution

Abstract

The performance and reproducibility of the BoMED NCCOM3 thoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiograph (TEB) has been evaluated in volunteers and patients. In resting supine volunteers, we determined the coefficient of variability over short time periods (30 min) and over several days, and examined the effects of differences in electrode type and electrode placement. The mean (range) intra-subject coefficients of variation (CV) for thoracic fluid index (TFI) and stroke volume (SV) were 1.0% (0.4-1.8%) and 4.7% (2.1-8.5%), respectively over a 30-min period. The corresponding CV were 5.6% (2.3-10.9%) and 10.9% (6.1-14.8%) for measurements made at rest on four separate occasions. Use of different electrode types (RedDot and Medicotest) resulted in differences in TFI (P less than 0.01), but not in mean values for SV or cardiac output (Q); their use in individual subjects revealed differences of up to 20% in SV and Q. Alterations in electrode placement by 5 cm in the horizontal and diagonal planes produced no significant changes in TFI, SV or Q; changes in the longitudinal plane produced a graded change. Increases of 5 cm and 10 cm in thoracic length produced mean increases in TFI of 9.8% and 39.8%, respectively, and mean decreases in Q of 8.4% and 16.7% and SV of 7.5% and 15.8%. TEB measurements of Q and SV were compared with thermodilution (TD) in 16 intensive care patients. Mean (SEM) Q by TEB was 5.63 (1.10) litre min-1 compared with TD 4.38 (0.72) litre min-1 (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effect of four different surgical prone positions on cardiovascular parameters in healthy volunteers

“…These measured changes are used to derive a value for cardiac output. The measurements made with this technique have been shown to correlate well with those derived using thermodilution techniques and they follow cardiac output trends as well as, if not better than, thermodilution techniques [4]. This study was designed to evaluate the cardiovascular effects of four different prone positions: on two pillows, on an evacuatable mattress, on two props with a support and in the knee-chest position.…”

Short-term postural reflexes in diabetic patients with autonomic dysfunction

“…The technique uses an equation to calculate cardiac output [16,27] that is based on a number of assumptions and the input of several measurements of patient size. Errors in these measurements can lead to large discrepancies in the measurement of cardiac output [31], which are further affected when lung injury is present [32,33]. However, the technique is still regarded by many as a reliable trend monitor and has been shown to provide reliable shortterm measurements of changes in stroke volume and cardiac output [18,34,35].…”

Impedance cardiographyThe impact of new technology

“…These electrodes are used to detect the impedance changes within the thorax. Their correct positioning is critical to the accuracy of the measurements [5]. In some newer systems, the positioning of these electrodes has been modified and low impedance patch electrodes are used.…”

“…Short-term repeatability is good, with those authors addressing the question quoting coefficients of variability for the method of 4-8% [5,34], which is better than thermodilution. A direct approach to the assessment of trending ability is difficult because of the lack of an accurate reference method.…”