2017
DOI: 10.1515/amb-2017-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive Diagnostics of Liver Fibrosis

Abstract: Abstract. Detecting new units of pathogenesis in the liver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fibrosis biomarkers can only be direct or indirect markers. Both types of markers can be individually used or in combination which is frequently happening to increase the diagnostic reliability [5,6]. There are multiple biological processes that the protein family of S100 has been reported to participate, such as cell motility, growth, transcription, signal transduction, apoptosis, and cell survival, which were correlated to tumorigenesis and normal development [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibrosis biomarkers can only be direct or indirect markers. Both types of markers can be individually used or in combination which is frequently happening to increase the diagnostic reliability [5,6]. There are multiple biological processes that the protein family of S100 has been reported to participate, such as cell motility, growth, transcription, signal transduction, apoptosis, and cell survival, which were correlated to tumorigenesis and normal development [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mihaylov et al [27] stated that HA could be used as in clinical practice to exclude advanced fibrosis because of its high negative predictive value (98-100%); thus it is the most accurate marker predicting advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C and B, steatosis and alcoholic liver disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%