Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008208.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
142
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
142
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…rTMS of M1 has proven efficacious in the treatment of chronic pain [16,19]. Further, high frequency rTMS of M1 in healthy populations show this technique can modulate experimental pain thresholds [16,26].…”
Section: Rtmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…rTMS of M1 has proven efficacious in the treatment of chronic pain [16,19]. Further, high frequency rTMS of M1 in healthy populations show this technique can modulate experimental pain thresholds [16,26].…”
Section: Rtmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, high frequency rTMS (>5 Hz) has been shown to increase neuronal excitability and consequently lead to a parallel increase in pain thresholds [26]. According to a Cochrane review, 2010, [19] low frequency rTMS alone, was not worthy of further research as a possible intervention for chronic pain. However, recent studies have demonstrated that preconditioning via tDCS reverses the expected effects of subsequent administration of low frequency rTMS [8], on the basis of standardizing the primary state of activity of the targeted area of the cortex.…”
Section: Tdcs Priming To Enhance 1 Hz Rtmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the analgesic effects, significant results have been reported in various persistent pain syndromes, such as fibromyalgia [10], central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury [11], and chronic migraine [12]. However, neither the analgesic outcomes with tDCS are consistent across studies [13][15], nor its endogenous neuromechanisms well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is the variation in applied stimulation parameters such as frequency (ranged from 5 Hz to 20 Hz), intensity of RMT (ranged from 80% to 115%), and total number of pulses (ranged between 120 and 2,500). A 2010 Cochrane Systematic Review concluded that higher stimulation frequencies (>5 Hz), greater numbers of stimuli (>500), and multiple sessions (>1) yielded better results 45. The contribution of many TMS factors, including coil orientation, duration of each pulse train, inter-train interval, and number of trains, is not yet understood.…”
Section: Review Of the Studies Of Rtms Of The Motor Cortex For Chronimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are considerable in both pain trials and device trials. However, given that TMS evokes both visual, auditory, and tactile sensations, sham procedures are difficult to design, and there is no consensus regarding the best design of a true double-blinded, sham-controlled study, since researchers and often subjects can usually distinguish between real and sham devices 45. Some methods of sham TMS offer visual verisimilitude, e.g.…”
Section: Review Of the Studies Of Rtms Of The Motor Cortex For Chronimentioning
confidence: 99%