2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2208-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-interactive multiple predator effects on tadpole survival

Abstract: We estimated interactions among and within three species of predator in their effects on prey survival using short-term predation experiments. The prey were Rana temporaria tadpoles, and the predators were dragonfly larvae (Anax imperator), newts (Triturus alpestris), and backswimmers (Notonecta glauca). Mortality rate per predator imposed by Triturus and Notonecta did not decline with predator density, whereas the predation rate of Anax was strongly reduced when the number of predator individuals increased. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For Sympetrum, we only found an increase in feeding rate in response to chemical cues but no differences between the control without the predation risk and either predation risk treatment; these results are not consistent with observations that it responds primarily to visual predation risk stimuli (Corbet, 2004;Crespo, 2011). Non-overlapping habitat domains may also render the prey unreceptive to predation risk cues (Anderson & Semlitsch, 2016;Ramos & Van Buskirk, 2012;Schmitz, 2007). Ischnura typically prefers early succession sites with few aquatic plants, while Aeshna larvae mostly occur in more densely vegetated habitats (Corbet, 2004).…”
Section: Impact Of Predation Risk and Habitat Complexity On Intermecontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…For Sympetrum, we only found an increase in feeding rate in response to chemical cues but no differences between the control without the predation risk and either predation risk treatment; these results are not consistent with observations that it responds primarily to visual predation risk stimuli (Corbet, 2004;Crespo, 2011). Non-overlapping habitat domains may also render the prey unreceptive to predation risk cues (Anderson & Semlitsch, 2016;Ramos & Van Buskirk, 2012;Schmitz, 2007). Ischnura typically prefers early succession sites with few aquatic plants, while Aeshna larvae mostly occur in more densely vegetated habitats (Corbet, 2004).…”
Section: Impact Of Predation Risk and Habitat Complexity On Intermecontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Non-independent effects of multiple predator species were reported in several predator-prey systems [34], [35]. For predators present in our study system, however, Ramos and Van Buskirk [36] reported no interaction effects between backswimmers, newts and dragonfly larvae, and a constant mortality rate per predator for backswimmers ( Notonecta sp.) and newts ( I. alpestris ), independent of predator-density.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…and newts ( I. alpestris ), independent of predator-density. In an experimental setup dragonfly larvae proved to be more effective in killing R. temporaria tadpoles than other predators [28], but also to interfere with each other, thus lowering their predation rate when occurring in higher densities [36]. Therefore, we considered the use of overall predator-density being the most appropriate surrogate for predation risk in our study, neglecting the potential differences in relative dangerousness of predator species [28], [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used likelihood ratio tests to compare models assuming substitutability between predators with models devoid of assumptions about their interactive effects on Pardosa survival (Ramos and Van Buskirk 2012). We used likelihood ratio tests to compare models assuming substitutability between predators with models devoid of assumptions about their interactive effects on Pardosa survival (Ramos and Van Buskirk 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%