2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2005.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-financial performance measurement in manufacturing companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
78
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
78
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered relevant aspects and approaches for this study. The measures of organizational performances are divided into two categories: financial and nonfinancial performance measures [35,36,39,40]. The performance standards were shown to have high reliability (Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.77 to 0.89) and content and construct validity as evidenced by convergent validity (factor loadings of respective measured items >0.50) and discriminant validity (AVE > r 2 ).…”
Section: Organizational Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We considered relevant aspects and approaches for this study. The measures of organizational performances are divided into two categories: financial and nonfinancial performance measures [35,36,39,40]. The performance standards were shown to have high reliability (Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.77 to 0.89) and content and construct validity as evidenced by convergent validity (factor loadings of respective measured items >0.50) and discriminant validity (AVE > r 2 ).…”
Section: Organizational Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first section covered the company's profile and the second section consisted of 16 items on SP practices and the third section consisted of 13 items on benefits (financial and nonfinancial) measured on a 1-5 Likert scale (5 represented strongly agree, most important, or strong improvement, whereas 1 represented strongly disagree, least important, or strong deterioration and 3 represented neutral, modest or fair) to assess the impact of implementation of SP practices on organizational performances. The nonfinancial performances (benefits) of the organization were generally covered by three major areas namely, local and international business performance, quality and operational performance, and social and environmental performance [35,36].…”
Section: Questionnaire Sample Design and Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A redução ou eliminação destes tipos de desperdícios resulta em melhorias significantes em todo o sistema produtivo e na surpreendente diminuição de custos (RAPOSO, 2011). Segundo Abdel-Maksoud et al, (2005) O conceito de desperdício no chão-de-fábrica (muda em japonês) é definido como qualquer atividade que não acrescenta valor aos produtos, e por isso é muito improvável que o cliente esteja disposto a pagar por isso (OHNO, 1988;SHINGO;DILLON, 1989e WOMACK et al, 2004 (TAPPING et al, 2002). Rother e Shook (2003) apontam as principais vantagens que a metodologia oferece: ajuda a visualizar mais do que os processos individuais; possibilita visualizar o fluxo; auxilia a identificar os desperdícios e suas fontes dentro do fluxo; fornece uma linguagem comum para tratar os processos de manufatura, sendo entendido por todos (utiliza ícones padronizados de fácil compreensão); possibilita as decisões sobre o fluxos visíveis e passíveis de discussão; junta conceitos e técnicas lean, propiciando a sua implementação de forma estruturada e integrada e não de forma isolada; forma uma base para o plano de implantação da mentalidade lean, sendo comparado a uma planta no processo VAN LANDEGHEM, 2007;SERRANO et al, 2008;XINYU;JIAN, 2009;KEMPER et al, 2010;SINGH et al, 2011;TEICHGRAEBER;BUCOURT,2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In a large scale survey of UK manufacturers, Abdel-Maksoud, Dugdale and Luther (2005) found evidence of widespread measurement and reporting of non-financial measures of performance, particularly measures relating to customer relationships and employee productivity. In addition, Perrin (2000) found that IC leaders (those who expect IC"s contribution to grow) are more active in measuring the performance of their IC and are, therefore, supplying themselves with appropriate management information.…”
Section: The Need For Internal Ic Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%