2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1319049/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-executive Director Compensation and Financial Distress in China and South Africa: A Comparative Analysis in State-Owned Enterprises

Abstract: The 21st century has witnessed the rise of new and major economic regions that were initially overlooked by traditional economic superpowers. This study examines two such economies namely: China and South Africa. Certain attributes of the agency theory are examined. Henceforth, the research investigates the relationship between non-executive directors (NEDs) compensation and financial distress within listed firms. Emphasis is placed on the operations of listed state-owned enterprises (SOEs). NEDs play a vital … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research shows that the concept of ownership, normally centralized among a small number of major shareholders, has shifted toward an equally significant symbolic contradiction among major controlling shareholders and minority shareholders (Connelly et al 2010;Luyckx et al 2022). Furthermore, major shareholders can benefit minority shareholders by supervising managers (Agrianti et al 2021;Aboud and Yang 2022), but alsobe noxious if they pursue personal aims different from maximizing profits or diminishing valuable management incentives (Burkart et al 1997;Emuron et al 2022). Outside the United States, the attendance of several major shareholders with considerable blocks of stock is common (Barca and Becht 2001;Daoud and Kharabsheh 2022).…”
Section: Shareholder Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research shows that the concept of ownership, normally centralized among a small number of major shareholders, has shifted toward an equally significant symbolic contradiction among major controlling shareholders and minority shareholders (Connelly et al 2010;Luyckx et al 2022). Furthermore, major shareholders can benefit minority shareholders by supervising managers (Agrianti et al 2021;Aboud and Yang 2022), but alsobe noxious if they pursue personal aims different from maximizing profits or diminishing valuable management incentives (Burkart et al 1997;Emuron et al 2022). Outside the United States, the attendance of several major shareholders with considerable blocks of stock is common (Barca and Becht 2001;Daoud and Kharabsheh 2022).…”
Section: Shareholder Powermentioning
confidence: 99%