2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-018-2186-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-equivalence of Dynamical Ensembles and Emergent Non-ergodicity

Abstract: Dynamical ensembles have been introduced to study constrained stochastic processes. In the microcanonical ensemble, the value of a dynamical observable is constrained to a given value. In the canonical ensemble a bias is introduced in the process to move the mean value of this observable. The equivalence between the two ensembles means that calculations in one or the other ensemble lead to the same result. In this paper, we study the physical conditions associated with ensemble equivalence and the consequences… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maxwell construction and additivity violation.-A natural question is whether time-dependent optimal trajectories exist which improve the additivity principle minimizers. The emergence of a non-convex regime in G(m|q) for |q| < |q c | suggests a Maxwell-like instantonic solution in this region [26,32,71]. In particular, as we show in [70], for PH-symmetric boundaries, fixed |q| < |q c | and m ∈ (m − q , m + q ), a trajectory which jumps smoothly (in a finite time)…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Maxwell construction and additivity violation.-A natural question is whether time-dependent optimal trajectories exist which improve the additivity principle minimizers. The emergence of a non-convex regime in G(m|q) for |q| < |q c | suggests a Maxwell-like instantonic solution in this region [26,32,71]. In particular, as we show in [70], for PH-symmetric boundaries, fixed |q| < |q c | and m ∈ (m − q , m + q ), a trajectory which jumps smoothly (in a finite time)…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Those equations of motion must be verified by the typical trajectories of the system, in particular if we start from a certain concentration ρ 0 and simply trace over the final concentration by taking θ t = 0. Since we have an explicit expression for L, we could inject it in (45), but that is not necessary: we know that L is positive by construction and cancels only at…”
Section: Equations Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sign of the Hamiltonian is indicated in each region, as a reference for the following deformations, in order to identify the critical point with highest value of H. Note that, in this context, the whole dynamics takes place on the f = 0 line due to the final condition, and that the notion of stability of fixed points is therefore different from the fluctuating case. Also note that the stable fixed point that will be reached depends on the initial condition, which is due to the breaking of ergodicity in the large-volume limit [44,45]. We represent the fixed point with the highest value of the Hamiltonian in green.…”
Section: A Schlögl Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, by combining Eqs. (87), (89) and (96) with the scaling in (97), we obtain for the correlators of the noise fields in the diffusive scaling limit…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%