Non-dominant hand use increases completion time on part B of the Trail Making Test but not on part A

Abstract

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is used in neuropsychological clinical practice to assess aspects of attention and executive function. The test consists of two parts (A and B) and requires drawing a trail between elements. Many patients are assessed with their non-dominant hand because of motor dysfunction that prevents them from using their dominant hand. Since drawing with the non-dominant hand is not an automatic task for many people, we explored the effect of hand use on TMT performance. The TMT was administered digitally in order to analyze new outcome measures in addition to total completion time. In a sample of 82 healthy participants, we found that non-dominant hand use increased completion times on the TMT B but not on the TMT A. The average completion time increased by almost 5 seconds, which may be clinically relevant. A substantial number of participants who performed the TMT with their non-dominant hand had a B/A ratio score of 2.5 or higher. In clinical practice, an abnormally high B/A ratio score may be falsely attributed to cognitive dysfunction. With our digitized pen data, we further explored the causes of the reduced TMT B performance by using new outcome measures, including individual element completion times and interelement variability. These measures indicated selective interference between non-dominant hand use and executive functions. Both non-dominant hand use and performance of the TMT B seem to draw on the same, limited higher-order cognitive resources.

Can Self-Regulatory Strength Training Counter Prior Mental Exertion? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

“…Among them, non-dominant hand use is eye-catching, as it was used in four investigations [ (1,48), study 2 and study 4 (53)]. Motor movements with the non-dominant hand are less intuitive and spontaneous, necessitating the use of greater cognitive resources (self-regulation) (76). Image studies have verified that using the non-dominant hand interferes with cognitive processing, and executing a motor task with the non-dominant hand increases cortical activity (77).…”

Effects of task complexity or rate of motor imagery on motor learning in healthy young adults

“…In the current study, the task was labeled as “complex” when it was performed by nondominant hand and the task was labeled as “simple” when it was performed by the dominant hand. The performance of a task by nondominant hand may pose high demands on the attention of individuals in several ways (Klaming & Vlaskamp, 2018 ). For example, a previous study indicates that the performance of a motor task is often slower with the nondominant hand, which is mainly due to reduced movement accuracy and increased need of corrective movements (Annett et al., 1979 ).…”

“…motor imagery, motor learning, physical practice | 3 of 11 HEENA Et Al. (Klaming & Vlaskamp, 2018). For example, a previous study indicates that the performance of a motor task is often slower with the nondominant hand, which is mainly due to reduced movement accuracy and increased need of corrective movements (Annett et al, 1979).…”

Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery

“…Most of the standard neuropsychological tests have a long history in the field and have traditionally been administered in paper-and-pencil form. However, assessing cognitive functioning using paper-and-pencil tests has major limitations: it is labor-intensive on the side of the clinician in terms of administration and scoring, provides little flexibility in stimulus use or updating of tests, and is severely limited in the type of outcome measures that can be extracted (Miller and Barr, 2017;Klaming and Vlaskamp, 2018). Digital cognitive testing effectively addresses some of these issues (Bauer et al, 2012;Riordan et al, 2013;Zygouris and Tsolaki, 2015;Feenstra et al, 2017;Galindo-Aldana et al, 2018;Germine et al, 2019;Kessels, 2019).…”