2017
DOI: 10.1080/17686733.2017.1326078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive testing procedure for porosity determination in carbon fibre reinforced plastics using pulsed thermography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the large scattering of the thermal diffusion times estimated by TSR, where the experimental log-log thermogram is fitted by a logarithmic polynomial of degree n=9 [30], no quantitative porosity estimation was possible, as also concluded by Mayr et al [6]. For all TSR evaluations, the measurement data T meas was not truncated and the full A-scan representation of the virtual wave, where the amplitude of the virtual waves is plotted versus the thermal diffusion time t d for the steps # = [7,11,15,19,23] temporal data (Fo = 0.05 -Fo = 1) was used for evaluation. Despite the doubled diffusion process through the material in reflection configuration the standard deviation of the estimated thermal diffusion time, carried out by the VWC, is also less than 4 % and therefore more accurate than the stateof-the-art method TSR.…”
Section: Results For Validation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the large scattering of the thermal diffusion times estimated by TSR, where the experimental log-log thermogram is fitted by a logarithmic polynomial of degree n=9 [30], no quantitative porosity estimation was possible, as also concluded by Mayr et al [6]. For all TSR evaluations, the measurement data T meas was not truncated and the full A-scan representation of the virtual wave, where the amplitude of the virtual waves is plotted versus the thermal diffusion time t d for the steps # = [7,11,15,19,23] temporal data (Fo = 0.05 -Fo = 1) was used for evaluation. Despite the doubled diffusion process through the material in reflection configuration the standard deviation of the estimated thermal diffusion time, carried out by the VWC, is also less than 4 % and therefore more accurate than the stateof-the-art method TSR.…”
Section: Results For Validation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…8b) are shown for five different steps # = [7,11,15,19,23], as these steps cover nearly the entire range of the step wedge. for five different steps # = [7,11,15,19,23]. The measurement parameters are given in Table 3 The comparison of the measured temperature values T meas (for only one pixel each step) to the regularized temperatures T ADMM reg show good agreement and demonstrate the filter effect due to regularization.…”
Section: Results For Validation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the resolution of these methods, they will only respond to volume-average void content, rather than providing the information about the location, size and morphology of each void that is needed in this study. [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%