2019
DOI: 10.3390/f10090728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Destructive Evaluation Techniques and What They Tell Us about Wood Property Variation

Abstract: To maximize utilization of our forest resources, detailed knowledge of wood property variation and the impacts this has on end-product performance is required at multiple scales (within and among trees, regionally). As many wood properties are difficult and time-consuming to measure our knowledge regarding their variation is often inadequate as is our understanding of their responses to genetic and silvicultural manipulation. The emergence of many non-destructive evaluation (NDE) methodologies offers the poten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, wood specific gravity was significantly reduced in 4cl1 mutants (Figure 2E). The mutants also exhibited significantly lower acoustic velocity (Figure 2F), which is correlated with the microfibril angle of the S2 layer (Schimleck et al, 2019). No other apparent growth anomaly was observed under greenhouse conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Accordingly, wood specific gravity was significantly reduced in 4cl1 mutants (Figure 2E). The mutants also exhibited significantly lower acoustic velocity (Figure 2F), which is correlated with the microfibril angle of the S2 layer (Schimleck et al, 2019). No other apparent growth anomaly was observed under greenhouse conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Several indirect measurement methods were developed for a range of physical, mechanical, and chemical wood properties in a collection of woody species [68]. Regardless of the method, its efficiency depends on the correlation between predictions and the actual phenotype, typically expressed by the regression model R 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, wood quality traits are expensive and time-consuming to measure, requiring laboratory facilities and technical expertise to process wood and assess the properties correctly. To overcome the challenge of characterizing a tree with a non-destructive, cost-effective, and faster procedure, wood technologists have developed indirect measurement methods [67,68] that inherently introduce a trade-off between accuracy and ease of measurement that depends on the trait and the objective of the characterization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would suggest then, there is currently no simple approach to account for error in lidarderived AGB arising from the inability to measure whole-tree basic woody tissue density. In the longer-term, hopefully new non-destructive estimation methods will be pioneered, with interesting research ongoing using x-ray computed tomography [47] and genome sequencing [48,49]. But in the meantime, our recommendation from the analysis of the data collected here, is that when viable, estimates acquired from direct measurements on the stems of trees are likely superior to those taken from the literature (mean tree-scale relative error in AGB est of 4 % and 9 % respectively).…”
Section: The More Tricky Issue Of Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%