“…Because of the low intensity of the C=O band, the aliphatic CH band region around 2800 cm -1 to 3000 cm -1 was chosen to study the degradation of EVA. 32,33 As shown in Figures 9(a) through 9(d), the results imply: (1) the lower C-H intensity of the middle pigmented EVA layer in comparison to other EVA layers is probably due to the diluted C-H concentration in the presence of the pigments; (2) the distribution profile of C-H intensity across three EVA layers for the sample aged in the low humidity is similar to that of the fresh sample, only the surface of EVA outer layer has slightly lower C-H intensity, which could be due to chemical degradation of the EVA surface; (3) in high humidity conditions, the thickness of the pigmented-EVA layer is visibly decreased, and the C-H intensity in this layer is lower than the fresh and the low humidity aged samples. Even though these changes could be due to water-assisted degradation of pigmented PET, the detailed mechanism is yet unclear; (4) the vicinity of EVA inner/PET core interfacial region shows a lower C-H intensity, which is consistent with Figures 7 and 8 showing chemical and topographic changes after exposure in high humidity; (5) the strong contrast of Raman image of the fluorescence intensity at 1660 cm -1 further confirms that chemical degradation has occurred in pigmented EVA layer during exposure in high humidity.…”