2018
DOI: 10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2018p0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Destructive 3D Failure Analysis Work Flow for Electrical Failure Analysis in Complex 2.5D-Based Devices Combining 3D Magnetic Field Imaging and 3D X-Ray Microscopy

Abstract: Industry and market requirements keep imposing demands in terms of tighter transistor packing, die and component real estate management on the package, faster connections and expanding functionality. This has forced the semiconductor industry to look for novel packaging approaches to allow for 3D stacking of transistors (the so called “More than Moore”). This complex 3D geometry, with an abundance of opaque layers and interconnects, presents a great challenge for failure analysis (FA). Three-dimensional (3D) m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,19 Therefore, XRM is used in R&D and in industrialization processes to inspect 3D ICs with TSVs on a regular basis to control and improve fabrication processes for metrological applications for process control, failure and defect localization in combination with other techniques or as a standalone investigation method. [19][20][21] One drawback of XRM, however, is the long measurement time that is required to image small micro-and nanometer sized cracks and voids inside the investigated samples. The measured voxel sizes are directly dependent on the investigated field of view, which depends mainly on the geometric and optical magnification of the system, resulting in a trade-off in resolution and the measured volume of the sample.…”
Section: Failure Analysis Methodologies Of Tsvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,19 Therefore, XRM is used in R&D and in industrialization processes to inspect 3D ICs with TSVs on a regular basis to control and improve fabrication processes for metrological applications for process control, failure and defect localization in combination with other techniques or as a standalone investigation method. [19][20][21] One drawback of XRM, however, is the long measurement time that is required to image small micro-and nanometer sized cracks and voids inside the investigated samples. The measured voxel sizes are directly dependent on the investigated field of view, which depends mainly on the geometric and optical magnification of the system, resulting in a trade-off in resolution and the measured volume of the sample.…”
Section: Failure Analysis Methodologies Of Tsvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, XRM is used in R&D and in industrialization processes to inspect 3D ICs with TSVs on a regular basis to control and improve fabrication processes for metrological applications for process control, failure and defect localization in combination with other techniques or as a standalone investigation method 19‐21 . One drawback of XRM, however, is the long measurement time that is required to image small micro‐ and nanometer sized cracks and voids inside the investigated samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field passes unaffected through the different layers, not hindered by the RDL. MFI can detect the location of a current path, even for low currents, and can provide depth information [6,7]. Another option to obtain depth information would be https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2020.113780 Received 28 May 2020; Accepted 10 July 2020 attempting MFI from the cross-section.…”
Section: Leakage Path Between Tsvsmentioning
confidence: 99%