2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-019-02388-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-crossing Brownian Paths and Dyson Brownian Motion Under a Moving Boundary

Abstract: We compute analytically the probability S(t) that a set of N Brownian paths do not cross each other and stay below a moving boundary g(τ ) = W √ τ up to time t. We show that for large t it decays as a power law S(t) ∼ t −β(N,W ) . The decay exponent β(N, W ) is obtained as the ground state energy of a quantum system of N non interacting fermions in a harmonic well in the presence of an infinite hard wall at position W . Explicit expressions for β(N, W ) are obtained in various limits of N and W , in particular… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where b j (x)−b j (0), j ∈ Z are independent standard Brownian bridges with b j (0) = b j (1), distances between consecutive endpoints b j+1 (0) − b j (0) are independent exponentially distributed random variables with parameter s, and b 0 (0) = h 0 (0). Deriving exact formulas from the Brownian bridge representation is still an open problem, though, even for the simple initial conditions (flat, Brownian, sharp wedge) for which the result is known from Bethe ansatz, see however [48] for related work. The idea that the contributions of the excited states of a theory should follow from that of the ground state by analytic continuation with respect to some parameter is not new, see for instance [49] for the quantum quartic oscillator, [50] for the Ising field theory on a circle (where the ground state energy is interestingly also given by an infinite sum of square roots, but with conjugate branch points paired), or [51] for models described by the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz.…”
Section: Full Dynamics From Large Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where b j (x)−b j (0), j ∈ Z are independent standard Brownian bridges with b j (0) = b j (1), distances between consecutive endpoints b j+1 (0) − b j (0) are independent exponentially distributed random variables with parameter s, and b 0 (0) = h 0 (0). Deriving exact formulas from the Brownian bridge representation is still an open problem, though, even for the simple initial conditions (flat, Brownian, sharp wedge) for which the result is known from Bethe ansatz, see however [48] for related work. The idea that the contributions of the excited states of a theory should follow from that of the ground state by analytic continuation with respect to some parameter is not new, see for instance [49] for the quantum quartic oscillator, [50] for the Ising field theory on a circle (where the ground state energy is interestingly also given by an infinite sum of square roots, but with conjugate branch points paired), or [51] for models described by the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz.…”
Section: Full Dynamics From Large Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a larger scope, we note that connections with random matrix theory and stochastic systems also exist for other fermionic systems, namely non-interacting fermions in a range of classic potentials, see for instance Ref. [52][53][54].…”
Section: Full Counting Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32,40,59]. We also refer to [11,10] and [35] for the emergences of Muttalib-Borodin ensemble in plane partitions and the Dyson Brownian motion under a moving boundary.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%