2020
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2020.3002152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Convex Feedback Optimization with Input and Output Constraints

Abstract: In this paper, we present a novel control scheme for feedback optimization. That is, we propose a discretetime controller that can steer a physical plant to the solution of a constrained optimization problem without numerically solving the problem. Our controller can be interpreted as a discretization of a continuous-time projected gradient flow. Compared to other schemes used for feedback optimization, such as saddle-point schemes or inexact penalty methods, our control approach combines several desirable pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the feedback structure contributes to robustness against unmeasured disturbances and model mismatch [18], [19], as well as autonomous tracking of trajectories of optimal solutions of time-varying problems [20]- [25]. Some works [20], [22], [23], [26] consider fast-stable plants that are abstracted as algebraic steady-state maps. Others take system dynamics into account and characterize sufficient conditions for the closedloop stability, including in continuous-time [21], [27]- [29] and sampled-data settings [30].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the feedback structure contributes to robustness against unmeasured disturbances and model mismatch [18], [19], as well as autonomous tracking of trajectories of optimal solutions of time-varying problems [20]- [25]. Some works [20], [22], [23], [26] consider fast-stable plants that are abstracted as algebraic steady-state maps. Others take system dynamics into account and characterize sufficient conditions for the closedloop stability, including in continuous-time [21], [27]- [29] and sampled-data settings [30].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others take system dynamics into account and characterize sufficient conditions for the closedloop stability, including in continuous-time [21], [27]- [29] and sampled-data settings [30]. Specifically, among works that handle nonconvex objectives and nonlinear systems, [22], [26] address discrete-time systems represented by algebraic maps, while [28] tackles continuous-time systems. The results on nonconvex feedback optimization for discrete-time nonlinear dynamical systems are still lacking.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our problem setting, w is not measurable (nor constant), so we run the algorithm (11) in parallel with the plant and replace evaluations of the steady-state map h with measurements of y obtained from the system. This online-feedbackequilibrium-seeking strategy renders the optimization routine robust to unmeasured w and to modelling errors 2 .…”
Section: Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ε ∈ (0, 1] is a relaxation parameter used to regulate the control action generated by (11). We next provide two concrete examples of equilibrium seeking algorithms before proceeding to a closed-loop stability analysis.…”
Section: Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation