2016
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1244647
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-conscious processes and dual-process theories in health psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(32 reference statements)
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent empirical work (Phillips, Cohen, Burns, Abrams, & Renninger, 2016;Phillips, Leventhal, & Leventhal, 2013) examined the role of two such processes in predicting longterm adherence: 'coherence' of beliefs (i.e., a certainty in one's beliefs regarding the illness and treatment that results directly from personal experience that a treatment does what it is expected to do), and medication-taking habit strength. This work draws on dualprocess theories (Hagger, 2016), which purport that individuals' behaviour is controlled by both deliberative/reflective processes (rational and conscious decision-making influences on action), and implicit/impulsive processes (well-learned, spontaneous, and non-conscious influences). Phillips et al (2013) posit that long-term medication adherence occurs if: (1) adherence behaviour is successfully initiated due to formation of treatment-favourable beliefs; (2) performance of the treatment provides evidence that the treatment is working, thereby confirming the individual's beliefs, resulting in a 'coherent' CSM and increased likelihood of treatment persistence; and (3) the medication-taking routine is repeated enough to develop automatic contextual cues that maintain the behaviour.…”
Section: Statement Of Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent empirical work (Phillips, Cohen, Burns, Abrams, & Renninger, 2016;Phillips, Leventhal, & Leventhal, 2013) examined the role of two such processes in predicting longterm adherence: 'coherence' of beliefs (i.e., a certainty in one's beliefs regarding the illness and treatment that results directly from personal experience that a treatment does what it is expected to do), and medication-taking habit strength. This work draws on dualprocess theories (Hagger, 2016), which purport that individuals' behaviour is controlled by both deliberative/reflective processes (rational and conscious decision-making influences on action), and implicit/impulsive processes (well-learned, spontaneous, and non-conscious influences). Phillips et al (2013) posit that long-term medication adherence occurs if: (1) adherence behaviour is successfully initiated due to formation of treatment-favourable beliefs; (2) performance of the treatment provides evidence that the treatment is working, thereby confirming the individual's beliefs, resulting in a 'coherent' CSM and increased likelihood of treatment persistence; and (3) the medication-taking routine is repeated enough to develop automatic contextual cues that maintain the behaviour.…”
Section: Statement Of Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent empirical work (Phillips, Cohen, Burns, Abrams, & Renninger, ; Phillips, Leventhal, & Leventhal, ) examined the role of two such processes in predicting long‐term adherence: ‘coherence’ of beliefs (i.e., a certainty in one's beliefs regarding the illness and treatment that results directly from personal experience that a treatment does what it is expected to do), and medication‐taking habit strength. This work draws on dual‐process theories (Hagger, ), which purport that individuals’ behaviour is controlled by both deliberative/reflective processes (rational and conscious decision‐making influences on action), and implicit/impulsive processes (well‐learned, spontaneous, and non‐conscious influences). Phillips et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrently, automatic processes may play an important role in the prediction of exercise behavior [24][25][26]. The pervasive effects of automatic on exercise behavior [27] suggest that the pandemic of physical inactivity [4] originates, at least in part, in automatic processes. Specifically, individuals may fail to exercise regularly despite conscious intentions to be active because BMEC activate competing automatic processes.…”
Section: Controlled and Automatic Processes In Exercise Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In keeping with its constituent theories, the TCM focuses exclusively on motivational and social cognition determinants of leisure-time physical activity participation. However, such an approach does not account for the potential influence of factors that affect individuals' behavior beyond their awareness and reflect non-conscious, automatic processes that determine behavior [29,30]. There has been a proliferation of research on behavioral determinants reflecting these processes in physical activity contexts [31][32][33][34], and reflect a general rise in interest in dual-process theories of motivation and social cognition [35].…”
Section: Extending the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%