2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-congruent colonizations and diversification in a coevolving pollination mutualism on oceanic islands

Abstract: A challenge for coevolutionary theory is how different types of interaction influence the diversification of coevolving clades. Reciprocal specialization is characteristic of certain coevolving, mutualistic interactions, but whether this specialization seen in ecological time constrains changes in patterns of interaction over evolutionary time remains unclear. Here, we examine the co-radiation of Glochidion trees (Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus s. l.) and pollinating, seed-predatory Epicephala moths (Lepidoptera:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
95
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolutionary relationships between plant species and their obligate pollinators vary among different obligate pollination systems (e.g. Epicephala-Phyllantheae [52]; euglossine bees-fragrance orchids [48]; sexually deceptive orchids [11]). However, plants in all such systems mainly depend on specific floral volatiles for establishing relatively strict but not absolute pollinator specificity (thus pre-zygotic isolation) among sympatric plant species [6,7,10,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolutionary relationships between plant species and their obligate pollinators vary among different obligate pollination systems (e.g. Epicephala-Phyllantheae [52]; euglossine bees-fragrance orchids [48]; sexually deceptive orchids [11]). However, plants in all such systems mainly depend on specific floral volatiles for establishing relatively strict but not absolute pollinator specificity (thus pre-zygotic isolation) among sympatric plant species [6,7,10,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the extent to which these interactions are phylogenetically constrained over evolutionary timescales has been of interest since the days of the earliest cophylogenetic analyses (Chenuil and McKey 1996; Herre et al 1996; Itino et al 2001; Lopez-Vaamonde et al 2001; Piercey-Normore and DePriest 2001; Weiblen 2001; Kawakita et al 2004; Quek et al 2004; Kawakita and Kato 2009; Althoff et al 2012; Cruaud et al 2012 a ; Hembry et al 2013; Chomicki et al 2015; Yang et al 2015). It is clear that in many cases, mutualisms between eukaryotic hosts and microbial endosymbionts are vertically transmitted and consequently show significant phylogenetic congruence (e.g., Moran et al 1993; Baumann and Baumann 2005; Urban and Cryan 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, thirteen species have been recorded prior to this study (Meyrick 1935; Kendrick 2005; Hu et al 2011a, b; Zhang et al 2012b; Li and Yang 2015; Wang and Li 2015; Yang and Li 2015). But there are still a large number of undescribed species of Epicephala , especially in tropical areas (Kawakita et al 2004; Kawakita and Kato 2006, 2009; Hembry et al 2012, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%