2018
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐canonical activation ofCREBmediates neuroprotection in aCaenorhabditis elegansmodel of excitotoxic necrosis

Abstract: Excitotoxicity, caused by exaggerated neuronal stimulation by Glutamate (Glu), is a major cause of neurodegeneration in brain ischemia. While we know that neurodegeneration is triggered by overstimulation of Glu‐receptors (GluRs), the subsequent mechanisms that lead to cellular demise remain controversial. Surprisingly, signaling downstream of GluRs can also activate neuroprotective pathways. The strongest evidence involves activation of the transcription factor cAMP response element‐binding protein (CREB), wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
(218 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also a significant rise in CREB expression in the LPS per se group compared to the control ( p < 0.05). This could be due to the neuroinflammation induced by LPS, which triggered the rise in CREB expression as it is a neuroprotective transcription factor ( Feldmann et al, 2019 ). Lev and CS pre-treatment further increased the expression of the CREB gene, and this increment is significant at CS extract at a dose of 50 mg/L ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also a significant rise in CREB expression in the LPS per se group compared to the control ( p < 0.05). This could be due to the neuroinflammation induced by LPS, which triggered the rise in CREB expression as it is a neuroprotective transcription factor ( Feldmann et al, 2019 ). Lev and CS pre-treatment further increased the expression of the CREB gene, and this increment is significant at CS extract at a dose of 50 mg/L ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model was challenged by several studies suggesting that CREB can be activated without Ser133 phosphorylation ( Brindle et al, 1995 ; Impey et al, 1996 ; Briand et al, 2015 ). The discovery of the CRTC family of coactivators brought elements of explanation about how CREB-mediated transcription could be enhanced independently of Ser133 phosphorylation, and suggested the existence of a non-canonical, alternative way of CREB target genes activation ( Conkright et al, 2003 ; Iourgenko et al, 2003 ; Altarejos and Montminy, 2011 ; Parra-Damas et al, 2017b ; Feldmann et al, 2019 ). De facto , the N-terminal domain of CRTCs interacts with the dimerization and DNA-binding bZIP domain of CREB in a phosphorylation-independent manner.…”
Section: Creb-regulated Transcription Coactivator 1 In Brain Function...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regeneration literature is rich in examples of the interplay between ARGs, histone modifications, and neural states, as reviewed by [23], where the authors summarize the roles of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) in regeneration and their interplay with cAMP/PKA/CREB signaling. cAMP/CREB signaling regulates neuronal survival and differentiation [49,50] and confers neuroprotection upon stress [51][52][53]. Interestingly, CREB1 was shown to be downregulated in the nucleus accumbens shell of socially isolated rats and regulate anxiety-like behaviors [24].…”
Section: Creba/creb3l1/oasismentioning
confidence: 99%