2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-biting midges in biodiversity conservation and environmental assessment: Findings from boreal freshwater ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has, conversely, been common place to exclude chironomids from water quality assessments, because the Chironimidae are a complex group, for which the required taxonomic expertise is often not available. In parallel to this position, it has also been suggested that the Chironomidae diversity does not add much relevant information and that other groups capture the needed information more easily for the lotic system at the level of the assemblage (Raunio et al, 2011). This idea has, however, been invalidated by the absence of, or at best weak, correlation in species richness of Chironomidae and other taxonomic groups (Heino et al, 2009;Heino, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has, conversely, been common place to exclude chironomids from water quality assessments, because the Chironimidae are a complex group, for which the required taxonomic expertise is often not available. In parallel to this position, it has also been suggested that the Chironomidae diversity does not add much relevant information and that other groups capture the needed information more easily for the lotic system at the level of the assemblage (Raunio et al, 2011). This idea has, however, been invalidated by the absence of, or at best weak, correlation in species richness of Chironomidae and other taxonomic groups (Heino et al, 2009;Heino, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The resulting environmental degradation calls for the monitoring of the environment and proper conservation planning (Raunio et al, 2011). Of all the freshwater organisms that have been considered for use in biological monitoring, benthic macroinvertebrates are most often recommended (Carter et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sampled adult chironomids with emergence traps, instead of sampling larvae, because this method provides information on chironomid species, which actually complete their aquatic larval stage in the study area (Raunio et al 2011). We used a specifically designed emergence trap built from plastic pipe and mesh to catch emerging species, placed at 5 m from the shore.…”
Section: Insect Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most benthic sampling methods use nets with a mesh size fine enough to collect small larvae (Storey and Pinder, 1985;Hudson and Adams, 1998). On the other hand, many studies have used surface floating pupal exuviae methods or chironomid pupal exuvial techniques to effectively assess the biological condition of aquatic habitats using community metrics (e.g., richness, composition, diversity indices, biotic indices) to assess the condition of lotic habitats (e.g., Cranston et al, 1997;Bitušík and Hamerlík, 2001;Hayford and Ferrington, 2005;Rieradevall, 2007;Raunio et al, 2011), resulting in a higher number of taxa. In the Dicle (Tigris) River Basin, drifting material contained numerous pupal exuviae from Chironominae and Orthocladiinae, and we identified 10 taxa using pupal exuviae material exclusively.…”
Section: Cricotopus Bicinctusmentioning
confidence: 99%