1993
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1993.10475938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Typologies are Misleading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
166
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
166
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is recognised that there are arguments against using interval scales and parametric methods with ordinal data, a reasoned assignment of an interval scale to the ordinal categories here can generate a useful raw score measure and aid interpretation and communication of results in the context of the study (Baguley, 2009;Velleman & Wilkinson, 1993). We are concerned here with making judgements on quality improvements, and a scale that gives a stronger positive emphasis to a desired goal of "very good" (rather than just "good"), and a stronger negative emphasis to "very poor" (rather than just "poor") may be useful.…”
Section: Effect Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is recognised that there are arguments against using interval scales and parametric methods with ordinal data, a reasoned assignment of an interval scale to the ordinal categories here can generate a useful raw score measure and aid interpretation and communication of results in the context of the study (Baguley, 2009;Velleman & Wilkinson, 1993). We are concerned here with making judgements on quality improvements, and a scale that gives a stronger positive emphasis to a desired goal of "very good" (rather than just "good"), and a stronger negative emphasis to "very poor" (rather than just "poor") may be useful.…”
Section: Effect Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, given the low number of participants and the strength of the repeated-measures ANCOVAs, we felt it would be better to proceed with the parametric analyses without eliminating those few, more extreme values. Parametric analyses were applied to the STAI, even though the data came from a Likert scale, given the simulations documenting the strength of this type of analysis when used with ordinal data (Velleman and Wilkinson, 1993;Davidson and Sharma, 1994;Stiger et al, 1998;Carifio and Perla, 2008;Norman, 2010). The homogeneity postulates for the regression slopes were respected [F(1.28) = 1.03 for heart rate, 1.23 for the STAI, all ns].…”
Section: D Studiomaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since its proposal Stevens' system has been criticized mainly for restricting the choice of statistical methods, leading to unnecessary resort to non-parametric methods, and that the taxonomy is too strict to apply to real-world data, instead of talking about meaningfulness (Velleman and Wilkinson 1993). For example, Mosteller (1977) argued for additional measurement levels such as Counted fractions , where measurements are bounded such that zero and one have specific meanings.…”
Section: Measurement and Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because we often find that the metric we have used is not optimal for a new hypothesis. According to Velleman and Wilkinson (1993):…”
Section: Turning Non-ordered Into Ordered Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation