2003
DOI: 10.5089/9781451859058.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominal Anchors in the CIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Keller and Richardson (2003) identified the motivation for dollarization of Russia's international and domestic assets and suggested that the CIS be highly dollarized for reducing exchange rate volatility and attaining financial stability. However, the euro qualifies to be an anchor currency for the CIS because of a number of reasons.…”
Section: Relevant Stabilization Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Keller and Richardson (2003) identified the motivation for dollarization of Russia's international and domestic assets and suggested that the CIS be highly dollarized for reducing exchange rate volatility and attaining financial stability. However, the euro qualifies to be an anchor currency for the CIS because of a number of reasons.…”
Section: Relevant Stabilization Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to the fact that the new EU members have the unique opportunity to import the reputation of the European Central Bank credibly by anticipating EMU membership. Keller and Richardson (2003) and Mongardini and Mueller (1999) provide evidence for a high degree of dollarization in the Kyrgyz Republic and other CIS economies including Russia and the Ukraine. Keller and Richardson (2003) find evidence for ratchet effects (hysteresis): once a country has achieved a high degree of dollarization, it may persist even if inflation returns to moderate levels.…”
Section: Exchange Rate Stabilization At High Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keller and Richardson (2003) and Mongardini and Mueller (1999) provide evidence for a high degree of dollarization in the Kyrgyz Republic and other CIS economies including Russia and the Ukraine. Keller and Richardson (2003) find evidence for ratchet effects (hysteresis): once a country has achieved a high degree of dollarization, it may persist even if inflation returns to moderate levels. Oomes (2003) observes payment dollarization in Russia for large household transactions as well as for intra-CIS trade.…”
Section: Exchange Rate Stabilization At High Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that apart from the bank lending channel, the interest rate channel, the asset channel, and the exchange rate channel are limited in their scope and ability by a set of negative factors: absense of well-functioning markets for fixed-income securities and equities, weak real estate markets, heavy central bank intervention in the foreign exchange markets, and by the very imperfect connections with the international capital markets. See (Keller, Richardson, 2003) for the discussion of exchange rate regimes in the CIS economies. In addition to the bank lending channel, the balance sheet channel is predicted to operate as a financial accelerator through the increased external finance premium (Mishra, Montiel and Spilimbergo, 2010).…”
Section: The Case Of Cismentioning
confidence: 99%