2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00116-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomenclature of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
505
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 951 publications
(515 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
8
505
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TTX pretreatment produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of ATX-induced sodium influx in rNa v 1.2-CHL 1610, rNa v 1.4-HEK 293 and rNa v 1.5-CHL 1610 cells with IC 50 values of 14.8 nM (11.2-19.8, 95% CI), 25.2 nM (20.1-31.7 nM, 95% CI) and 3.47 μM (2.33-5.15, 95% CI), respectively (Figure 5). These inhibitory potencies of TTX are consistent with the expected sodium channel pharmacology in that rNa v 1.2 and rNa v 1.4 are TTX sensitive with IC 50 values in the nanomolar range whereas rNa v 1.5 is relatively insensitive with an IC 50 value in the low micromolar range [18]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…TTX pretreatment produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of ATX-induced sodium influx in rNa v 1.2-CHL 1610, rNa v 1.4-HEK 293 and rNa v 1.5-CHL 1610 cells with IC 50 values of 14.8 nM (11.2-19.8, 95% CI), 25.2 nM (20.1-31.7 nM, 95% CI) and 3.47 μM (2.33-5.15, 95% CI), respectively (Figure 5). These inhibitory potencies of TTX are consistent with the expected sodium channel pharmacology in that rNa v 1.2 and rNa v 1.4 are TTX sensitive with IC 50 values in the nanomolar range whereas rNa v 1.5 is relatively insensitive with an IC 50 value in the low micromolar range [18]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…KishinoHasegawa and Shimodaira-Hasegawa tests using RELL bootstraps with 1000 replicates found our topology to be significantly better at explaining the data than all three possible resolutions of Piontkivska and Hughes (2003) (Table 3), and the K-H tests also found our topology to be significantly better than Goldin et al (2000). However, the molecular data could not reject the topology of Plummer and Meisler (1999) and Goldin (2002) or the topology of Lopreato et al (2001) (Table 3).…”
Section: Tree Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…On the basis of several criteria and tests, our topology for mammalian SCNA gene phylogeny was significantly better at explaining the molecular data than the topology of Goldin et al (2000) and all three possible resolutions of Piontkivska and Hughes (2003) (Table 3).…”
Section: Tree Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations