2004
DOI: 10.1177/1103308804039633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noisy Girls

Abstract: Young women have taken up new subject positions in a historical period when the subject of modernity has been declared dead. Subject positions have been far from selfevident either in the cultural context, or in the young women themselves, a fact that may, paradoxically, have helped them produce modern reflexive subjectivities with greater ease. It has been more necessary for contemporary girls than for boys to ask who they are and who they want to become. By gradually changing the norms for how gender, body o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new ‘ideal’ female subject does not only embody attributes traditionally associated with femininity, but also attributes typically associated with masculinity (Gonick, 2004, 2006; Ringrose, 2007). This combines characteristics such as being emotional and the view that women are restricted to the private sphere as an expression of ‘traditional’ femininity (Lewis, 2014: 114) with characteristics such as being autonomous and rational (Nielsen, 2004: 11), assertive (Ringrose, 2007: 484), professionally successful (McRobbie, 2009: 31), and powerful (Pomerantz et al, 2013) that are traditionally associated with masculinity.…”
Section: Constructions Of the ‘Ideal’ Female Subject In Late Modernitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new ‘ideal’ female subject does not only embody attributes traditionally associated with femininity, but also attributes typically associated with masculinity (Gonick, 2004, 2006; Ringrose, 2007). This combines characteristics such as being emotional and the view that women are restricted to the private sphere as an expression of ‘traditional’ femininity (Lewis, 2014: 114) with characteristics such as being autonomous and rational (Nielsen, 2004: 11), assertive (Ringrose, 2007: 484), professionally successful (McRobbie, 2009: 31), and powerful (Pomerantz et al, 2013) that are traditionally associated with masculinity.…”
Section: Constructions Of the ‘Ideal’ Female Subject In Late Modernitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is not a form of individualism that exists apart from relational considerations. It is a form of relational individualism (Nielsen, 2004), as shown by the way Pat is also affectively attuned to how subsequent generations benefit too from experiencing everyday freedoms from externally imposed needs and wants. For Pat, it is important that the freely available food she values is also freely available to her children.…”
Section: Pat and Sally -From Frugality To Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the mid-1980s researchers from various academic backgrounds have investigated a wide array of young women's creative expressions and their circumstances within both youth culture and school environments. The label young women was a distinction based on age, but it also reflected an analytical preoccupation with genera-tional differences and the conflicting positioning of girls and girlhood within modern society (Drotner and Rudberg 1993;Bjerrum-Nielsen 2004). Because gender equality not only represents a political ambition, but also a cultural ideal in Nordic societies, young female subjects have had to negotiate a set of opportunities and pressures both as girls and as women in the making.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%