2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0437-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise mapping of densely populated neighborhoods—example of Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro—Brazil

Abstract: Copacabana is one of the most famous neighborhoods of the city of Rio de Janeiro/Brazil but suffers from a high inhabitant density. One of the many environmental problems faced is related to noise pollution. In order to assess not only the noise levels, to which the population is exposed, but also to quantify the influence of architectural aspects, the paper presents the steps taken towards a simulation of the noise emission and propagation in this area. The results of the simulation are compared to measuremen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is worrisome, given that constant noise actually poses a public health risk which the affected population is often unaware of. [13] and São Paulo [24]. In all these other cities, traffic noise of vehicles was pointed out as the main source of annoyance for the population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion is worrisome, given that constant noise actually poses a public health risk which the affected population is often unaware of. [13] and São Paulo [24]. In all these other cities, traffic noise of vehicles was pointed out as the main source of annoyance for the population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the grid size adopted for the calculation was 5 m × 5 m, allowing for better detailing of the noise maps (Guedes & Leite, 2007;Lee et al, 2008;Fiedler & Zannin, 2015). The height of the grid used in this study was four meters, following recommendations found in the current bibliography (Pinto & Mardones, 2009;Murphy & King, 2010;Guedes et al, 2011;Murphy & King, 2011;Fiedler & Zannin, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, which corresponds to the noise levels at a height of 1.5 meters, approximately the height of the measuring microphone. Table 4 shows a comparison between the simulation results and the real measured data (Pinto & Mardones, 2008). The parameters used in the simulation can then be modified in order to reduce the level differences obtained.…”
Section: Sound Propagation and Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%