2013
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2013.2282123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise Estimation From Digital Step-Model Signal

Abstract: This paper addresses the noise estimation in the digital domain and proposes a noise estimator based on the step signal model. It is efficient for any distribution of noise because it does not rely only on the smallest amplitudes in the signal or image. The proposed approach uses polarized/directional derivatives and a nonlinear combination of these derivatives to estimate the noise distribution (e.g., Gaussian, Poisson, speckle, etc.). The moments of this measured distribution can be computed and are also cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Immerkær’s fast noise variance estimation (FNVE) [9], Khalil’s median absolute deviation (MAD) based noise estimation [39], Santiago’s variance mode (VarMode) noise level estimation [40] and Zoran’s discrete cosine transform (DCT) based noise estimation [12] were chosen as the classical noise level estimation methods. The Olivier’s nonlinear noise estimator (NOLSE) [11], Pyatykh’s principal component analysis (PPCA) based noise esti-mation [17] and Lyu’s noise variance estimation (EstV) [13] were selected as the state-of-the-art noise estimation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Immerkær’s fast noise variance estimation (FNVE) [9], Khalil’s median absolute deviation (MAD) based noise estimation [39], Santiago’s variance mode (VarMode) noise level estimation [40] and Zoran’s discrete cosine transform (DCT) based noise estimation [12] were chosen as the classical noise level estimation methods. The Olivier’s nonlinear noise estimator (NOLSE) [11], Pyatykh’s principal component analysis (PPCA) based noise esti-mation [17] and Lyu’s noise variance estimation (EstV) [13] were selected as the state-of-the-art noise estimation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further improve the accuracy of Immerkær’s estimation, Yang et al [10] appended adaptive Sobel edge detector to eliminate edges before Laplacian filtering operation. A step signal filter model is presented in [11]. This model is a nonlinear combination of polarized and directional derivatives, and is used to address edges detection and noise estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated above, the parameter of this filtering, i.e., the size of the structuring element, is not critical, and there is a wide range of values in which the performance of the filtering is optimum. The mean value of the standard deviation of the speckle noise within the dataset used in this work is estimated using the NOLSE estimator [ 71 ], resulting in , within the range of = [0.0030–0.0292]. To evaluate the robustness to speckle noise of the proposed method, we tested the method over the OCT images with synthetically added speckle noise with standard deviation from to (variance from to ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serir et al [8] used the blur effect on real images to measure the image quality. The noise estimation in the digital domain [9] and other quality assessment methods for certain distorted types had also achieved effective results. Hassen et al [10] provided an image sharpness assessment based on local phase coherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%