2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97304-3_82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node Based Row-Filter Convolutional Neural Network for Brain Network Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods fall into three categories: fMRI-based methods, DTI-based methods, fMRI- and DTI-based methods. More specifically, fMRI-based methods are Pearson coefficient (PC) (Betzel et al, 2016 ), low-rank sparse representation (LSR) (Qiao et al, 2016 ), weighted sparse group representation (WSGR) (Yu et al, 2017 ), Strength and Similarity GSR (SSGSR) (Zhang et al, 2019 ), high-order FC (HOFC) (Chen et al, 2016 ), topographic FC (tHOFC) (Zhang et al, 2016a ), Graph-CNN (GCNN) (Mao et al, 2018 ), and Siamese-GCN (SGCN) (Ktena et al, 2017 ). DTI-based methods are Graph kernel (GK) (Kang et al, 2012 ), Graph-CNN (GCNN) (Mao et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These methods fall into three categories: fMRI-based methods, DTI-based methods, fMRI- and DTI-based methods. More specifically, fMRI-based methods are Pearson coefficient (PC) (Betzel et al, 2016 ), low-rank sparse representation (LSR) (Qiao et al, 2016 ), weighted sparse group representation (WSGR) (Yu et al, 2017 ), Strength and Similarity GSR (SSGSR) (Zhang et al, 2019 ), high-order FC (HOFC) (Chen et al, 2016 ), topographic FC (tHOFC) (Zhang et al, 2016a ), Graph-CNN (GCNN) (Mao et al, 2018 ), and Siamese-GCN (SGCN) (Ktena et al, 2017 ). DTI-based methods are Graph kernel (GK) (Kang et al, 2012 ), Graph-CNN (GCNN) (Mao et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, fMRI-based methods are Pearson coefficient (PC) (Betzel et al, 2016 ), low-rank sparse representation (LSR) (Qiao et al, 2016 ), weighted sparse group representation (WSGR) (Yu et al, 2017 ), Strength and Similarity GSR (SSGSR) (Zhang et al, 2019 ), high-order FC (HOFC) (Chen et al, 2016 ), topographic FC (tHOFC) (Zhang et al, 2016a ), Graph-CNN (GCNN) (Mao et al, 2018 ), and Siamese-GCN (SGCN) (Ktena et al, 2017 ). DTI-based methods are Graph kernel (GK) (Kang et al, 2012 ), Graph-CNN (GCNN) (Mao et al, 2018 ). fMRI- and DTI-based methods are multi-kernel (MK) (Dyrba et al, 2015 ), our methods without space alignment, our method without node importance information, and our proposed methods (JCFBN).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the proposed GIGCN method with several methods, including, Node Based Row-Filter Convolutional Neural Network (NRF-CNN) [7], Siamese-GCN (sGCN) [6], Disease Prediction Graph Convolutional Networks (DP-GCN) [8]. NRF-CNN [7] and sGCN [6] are two works construct graph at the brain region level, i.e., the internal brain graph method.…”
Section: Performance Of Our Full Methods On Brain Disease Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the difference of graph construction strategies, the GCNbased brain disease diagnosis studies can be roughly divided into the following two categories. The first category follows the graph classification paradigm which constructs graph at the brain region level, where nodes represent brain regions and edges incorporate associations between brain regions [6,7]. The algorithms in the second category treat each subject as a single node, so that the associations or similarities between subjects can be represented by graph edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%